Independent research. A clearer software perspective.
Business SoftwareConsensus Index

THE RESEARCH LIBRARY

Project Management & Team Collaboration Software research

Compare Project Management & Team Collaboration Software through independent AI consensus studies. Start with your software situation, then explore the providers and evidence.

15published studiesUnderstand the methodology

THE CATEGORY VIEW

Which providers show up most consistently?

A broader look across the published Project Management & Team Collaboration Software studies. Compare recommendation prominence, then find the research for your situation.

Explore individual studies
Studies included
15
Usable AI responses
103
Platforms represented
7
Entities qualifying
34
Project Management & Team Collaboration Software: leading category rankings. Scores measure AI recommendation prominence across published studies.
RankProvider / published entityConsensus scoreStudy coverageAI mentions
01ClickUp
24.9 / 100
13 / 15 studies41 / 10339.8% of usable responses
02monday.com
17.9 / 100
13 / 15 studies36 / 10335.0% of usable responses
03Smartsheet
17.8 / 100
9 / 15 studies29 / 10328.2% of usable responses
04Wrike
17.1 / 100
11 / 15 studies31 / 10330.1% of usable responses
05Asana
15.6 / 100
11 / 15 studies30 / 10329.1% of usable responses
06Teamwork
11.1 / 100
4 / 15 studies18 / 10317.5% of usable responses
07Jira
10.2 / 100
3 / 15 studies13 / 10312.6% of usable responses
08Productive
9.4 / 100
3 / 15 studies14 / 10313.6% of usable responses
09Trello
9.4 / 100
5 / 15 studies14 / 10313.6% of usable responses
10Linear
8.5 / 100
3 / 15 studies11 / 10310.7% of usable responses
See all 34 qualifying entities
Project Management & Team Collaboration Software: remaining category rankings. Scores measure AI recommendation prominence across published studies.
RankProvider / published entityConsensus scoreStudy coverageAI mentions
11Notion
7.4 / 100
4 / 15 studies12 / 10311.7% of usable responses
12Scoro
7.3 / 100
3 / 15 studies11 / 10310.7% of usable responses
13ServiceNow
7.3 / 100
2 / 15 studies10 / 1039.7% of usable responses
14Kantata
6.7 / 100
2 / 15 studies8 / 1037.8% of usable responses
15Procore
6.2 / 100
2 / 15 studies9 / 1038.7% of usable responses
16ONES.com
5.2 / 100
7 / 15 studies8 / 1037.8% of usable responses
17BigTime
4.9 / 100
2 / 15 studies8 / 1037.8% of usable responses
18Adobe Workfront
4.8 / 100
5 / 15 studies10 / 1039.7% of usable responses
19Basecamp
4.5 / 100
2 / 15 studies9 / 1038.7% of usable responses
20Oracle Primavera Cloud
4.4 / 100
2 / 15 studies7 / 1036.8% of usable responses
21Celoxis
3.3 / 100
3 / 15 studies5 / 1034.8% of usable responses
22ProjectManager
3.2 / 100
2 / 15 studies5 / 1034.8% of usable responses
23Airtable
3.2 / 100
5 / 15 studies8 / 1037.8% of usable responses
24Onplana
2.8 / 100
3 / 15 studies5 / 1034.8% of usable responses
25Zoho Projects
2.8 / 100
3 / 15 studies5 / 1034.8% of usable responses
26Frame.io
2.6 / 100
2 / 15 studies5 / 1034.8% of usable responses
27Ravetree
2.5 / 100
2 / 15 studies4 / 1033.9% of usable responses
28Projectworks
2.4 / 100
2 / 15 studies4 / 1033.9% of usable responses
29Avaza
1.9 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1032.9% of usable responses
30Plutio
1.8 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1032.9% of usable responses
31Breeze
1.7 / 100
3 / 15 studies3 / 1032.9% of usable responses
32Freedcamp
1.2 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1032.9% of usable responses
33Nifty
1.0 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1032.9% of usable responses
34ProofHub
0.6 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1032.9% of usable responses

How to read this. A first-place recommendation earns 10 points, second place 9, down to 1 point for tenth. An absence earns zero. We average within each platform, then across platforms and studies, and scale to 100. Each study has equal weight.

Only valid ranking responses count. Qualification requires at least two studies and three response appearances. Published names are grouped by case and punctuation; distinct name variants remain separate. A broad score can favor providers serving many software needs. It is not a customer rating, service guarantee, or assessment of workload compatibility.

Research dates: 2026-10-01 to 2026-10-02. Read the ranking methodology →

Find a study for your software needs

Showing 1–15 of 15 results

Independent research · Open methodology