GoodDay Review: Microsoft Teams and Office 365 Integration

The research in brief

GoodDay is a mixed fit for organizations that want project management tightly embedded in Microsoft Teams and Office 365. Two of seven platforms named GoodDay during the ranking stage, at an average listed rank of 3.5 and a best rank of 3. Its strongest argument is breadth: Gantt views, time tracking, automation, resource and finance modules, and API access at published prices of $4–$7 per user per month, with advertised Teams, Outlook, SharePoint, and Microsoft sign-in touchpoints ^[14]. The main limitation is that no platform confirmed a deeply native Teams app experience, full two-way Office 365 synchronization, or Microsoft Entra ID administrative controls. Every platform rated GoodDay a mixed fit for this use case.

Research Snapshot

Why GoodDay Qualified for This Study

Questions explored

• Is GoodDay a good choice for microsoft teams and office 365 integrated pm?
• Why did only two of seven AI platforms name GoodDay for Microsoft 365 project management?

GoodDay qualified because two platforms named it during ranking discovery and both placed it in the top four. Anthropic listed it at rank 4 and Grok at rank 3, producing an average listed rank of 3.5 and a best rank of 3 ^[6]. That is a minority position: five of seven platforms did not name GoodDay in the ranking stage, so its inclusion rests on a 28.6% share of included platform responses rather than broad consensus.

Qualification also reflects genuine advertised Microsoft touchpoints. GoodDay states that its Microsoft Teams integration provides task updates and allows users to create work items from Teams conversations, that Outlook integration supports email-to-task conversion and Microsoft 365 calendar synchronization, that SharePoint documents can be accessed and attached within projects, and that Microsoft sign-in is supported ^[14]. GoodDay's own comparison content also lists Microsoft Teams, Outlook, and SharePoint as native integrations ^[4].

The qualification is not an endorsement of integration depth. Every platform that evaluated GoodDay for this use case rated it a mixed fit, and the reasons were consistent: the Microsoft connections are advertised but thinly documented. This review therefore treats GoodDay as a candidate worth piloting, not as a confirmed Microsoft-native solution.

The software offering in focus

Questions explored

• Which GoodDay plan should a buyer choose if they need Microsoft Teams integration and Microsoft identity SSO?
• Is GoodDay Professional enough for Microsoft 365 project management, or is Enterprise required?

The relevant configuration is GoodDay Professional or Business, escalating to Enterprise when Microsoft identity administration and SSO are mandatory ^[15]. Professional is the plan that carries the core project-management functions a mid-market project organization is likely to need: Gantt views, time tracking, unlimited automations, custom fields, reports and advanced analytics, advanced integrations, public sharing, recurrent tasks and events, and API access ^[15]. Business adds workload and resource management, finance, CRM, a customer portal, custom branding, project baselines, advanced HR, and expense tracking ^[15].

Enterprise is the tier that matters if Microsoft identity governance is non-negotiable. GoodDay advertises enterprise SAML-based SSO and Microsoft-related authentication, but the reviewed pages provide limited detail on Microsoft-specific administration ^[13]. Google's research found that full SAML-based corporate single sign-on required for automated Microsoft Entra ID provisioning and enterprise administrative controls is locked behind the custom-priced Enterprise plan ^[15]. Kimi reported Microsoft SSO available on Professional and Enterprise plans, which conflicts with that gating description ^[2]. Buyers should treat the plan-to-SSO mapping as unresolved.

Plan user ranges add another qualifier. The pricing page lists Professional for 5–250 users, Business for 15–350 users, and Enterprise for 25 to unlimited users, while also displaying separate standard-plan seat bundles ^[15]. Those ranges and entitlements should be confirmed rather than assumed.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions explored

• What do AI platforms agree GoodDay does well for Microsoft 365 teams?
• Does GoodDay actually integrate with Microsoft Teams, Outlook, and SharePoint?

Agreement was unanimous on the verdict and strong on the underlying facts. All seven platforms rated GoodDay a mixed fit for Microsoft Teams and Office 365 integrated project management. No platform rated it a strong fit, and none rated it a poor fit.

Platforms agreed that GoodDay advertises Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Microsoft 365 calendar, SharePoint, and Microsoft sign-in connections ^[14]. Independent coverage corroborates that connectivity exists: The Digital Project Manager lists Microsoft Teams among GoodDay integrations and describes native integrations with Microsoft 365 and related Microsoft apps ^[24], while SoftwareHope lists OneDrive, Microsoft Teams, and Microsoft Office 365 integrations ^[18]. Crozdesk lists SharePoint file attachments and basic Microsoft Office tool sync ^[20].

Platforms also agreed on feature breadth. GoodDay combines project planning, collaboration, time tracking, reporting, and automation with Microsoft Teams support ^[6], and supports unlimited hierarchies, 20+ views, workflow configuration, and time tracking ^[6]. Most core features are included in each plan rather than sold as add-ons, with Gantt charts, time tracking, analytics, and resource management available without separate modules ^[8].

Finally, platforms agreed that GoodDay is not positioned as a Microsoft-native product. Anthropic's research noted that GoodDay's own comparison content ranks Microsoft Planner as superior for native ecosystem fit, offering basic task lists, kanban boards, and project schedules directly inside a Teams tab ^[6]. That is a company-owned admission, not independent verification, but it aligns with every platform's assessment.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions explored

• How deep is GoodDay's Microsoft Teams integration compared with Microsoft Planner?
• Does GoodDay support Microsoft Entra ID SSO, SCIM provisioning, and conditional access?

Disagreement centered on integration mechanics, identity, and pricing rather than on the overall verdict.

On Teams depth, platforms split between "app exists" and "app is not native." DeepSeek reported that GoodDay provides a Microsoft Teams app listed in the Microsoft Teams AppSource marketplace ^[19]. Grok found no evidence of a native Teams app and described integration as occurring via Zapier, viaSocket, or similar third-party tools ^[25]. Anthropic described integration through third-party connector methods and Zapier automation rather than deep embedded tab-based workflow ^[31]. OpenAI stated that public material does not clearly document whether this is a full Teams-native app with tabs, personal app support, adaptive cards, command functionality, or comprehensive two-way synchronization ^[14]. Google concluded the Teams integration is restricted to notifications and task creation, lacking a complete interactive embedded dashboard or tab application inside Teams ^[13]. These are not reconcilable from the supplied evidence; the AppSource listing and the depth question are separate facts.

On calendar and file synchronization, Google reported a full two-way calendar synchronization with Microsoft Outlook, with changes auto-syncing and users able to filter which event types are shared ^[12]. Anthropic reported no confirmed real-time Outlook calendar synchronization and no confirmed SharePoint file integration or Microsoft Graph-based workflows ^[3]. OpenAI described Outlook email-to-task and calendar synchronization as advertised but unspecified as to direction, supported objects, conflict handling, latency, or shared calendars ^[14]. Perplexity found Microsoft 365 connectivity visible but depth unverifiable ^[14].

On Microsoft identity, Anthropic noted that GoodDay's website lists Microsoft Entra as a native integration but no public documentation confirms whether this implements conditional access, nested app authentication, or basic SAML redirect SSO ^[2]. OpenAI found that public evidence does not confirm SAML SSO specifically uses Microsoft Entra ID, nor does it document SCIM provisioning, automated deprovisioning, group-based assignment, or conditional access ^[14]. Grok found SAML-based SSO supported for enterprise with no specific Microsoft Entra ID or Azure AD mention ^[13]. Kimi reported Microsoft SSO via Azure AD/Entra ID on Professional and Enterprise plans, requiring additional SaaS app registration and consent management ^[2].

On pricing, figures conflict. OpenAI and the official pricing page show Professional at $4 per user per month and Business at $7 per user per month on the displayed monthly/annual view, with a stated 30% annual saving ^[15]. Forbes Advisor lists Professional at $6 and Business at $10 monthly, consistent with monthly billing rather than annual ^[28]. Grok reported Professional at $4 annual or $6 monthly and Business at $7 annual or $10 monthly ^[6]. DeepSeek could not verify 2026 US dollar figures at all ^[2]. Perplexity found no verified current list pricing ^[16].

Documentation inconsistency is itself a finding. GoodDay's modules page describes Teams, Outlook/Microsoft 365, SharePoint, and Microsoft sign-in integrations, while its separate integrations page does not prominently document those Microsoft integrations and instead emphasizes Google services ^[14]. Google's research found the primary native focus skewed toward Google Workspace, with deeper G Suite, Google Drive, Google Calendar, and Gmail plugins than Microsoft counterparts ^[11].

Features for this workload

Questions explored

• Can GoodDay users manage projects entirely inside Microsoft Teams without switching apps?
• Does GoodDay sync Outlook calendars and SharePoint files two-way with Microsoft 365?

Capability evidence is strongest for project management and weakest for Microsoft-native depth.

Microsoft Teams integration. GoodDay states that its Teams integration provides task updates and allows users to create work items from Teams conversations ^[14]. Google described this as a basic connector for notifications and task creation without rich native app capabilities such as embedding full project boards, lists, or dashboards inside Teams tabs ^[13]. Kimi characterized the Teams app as an iframe or container experience rather than native Microsoft data surfaces, producing context switching between GoodDay's UI paradigm and Microsoft's ^[30]. DeepSeek's AppSource listing confirms an app exists ^[19], but no platform confirmed which Teams surfaces are supported.

Office 365 calendar and Outlook. GoodDay states that Outlook integration supports email-to-task conversion and calendar synchronization for Microsoft 365 ^[14]. Google reported full two-way Outlook calendar synchronization with selective event filtering ^[12]. Kimi reported that calendar sync requires separate API connections with potential sync delays and manual mapping ^[22]. Anthropic found no confirmed real-time bidirectional sync ^[4]. The direction, latency, and shared-calendar behavior remain unverified.

SharePoint and Office files. GoodDay states that SharePoint documents can be accessed and attached within projects ^[14]. Crozdesk lists SharePoint file attachments and basic Microsoft Office tool sync ^[20]. OpenAI noted that this supports document linking or attachment but does not establish full SharePoint library synchronization, coauthoring inside GoodDay, metadata preservation, permissions mirroring, or Office-document version governance ^[14]. Kimi reported that GoodDay is not natively embedded in the Microsoft 365 data layer and that SharePoint, OneDrive, and Exchange integration requires separate API connectors ^[1].

Microsoft identity and SSO. GoodDay advertises Sign in with Microsoft and separately lists enterprise SAML SSO ^[14]. Enterprise SAML SSO is gated behind the Enterprise plan according to Google ^[15]. Entra ID provisioning, conditional access, and lifecycle management are not publicly documented in the reviewed sources ^[14].

Admin manageability. Kimi reported that GoodDay requires separate admin consoles for user provisioning, permission management, and feature configuration, whereas Microsoft-native tools are managed through the Microsoft 365 Admin Center, Entra ID, and Power Platform Admin Center with unified audit logs, DLP policies, and conditional access integration ^[1]. OpenAI found Enterprise described as supporting unlimited users, advanced security and compliance, and quote-based purchasing, but insufficient detail to confirm Microsoft-tenant-level administration ^[15].

Project management capability. Professional includes Gantt views, time tracking, unlimited automations, custom fields, reports and advanced analytics, advanced integrations, public sharing, recurrent tasks and events, and API access; Business adds workload and resource management, finance, CRM, a customer portal, custom branding, project baselines, advanced HR, and expense tracking ^[15]. GoodDay supports unlimited project hierarchy, 20+ views, custom workflows, custom fields, and custom task types, exceeding Microsoft Planner's flexibility for advanced use cases ^[6].

Integration fallback. GoodDay advertises a GoodDay API and Zapier integrations, which may support custom Microsoft 365 workflows when native coverage is insufficient, at the cost of added implementation and maintenance effort ^[13]. Zapier documents a no-code GoodDay–Microsoft Teams connection ^[31]. ViaSocket also offers GoodDay–Teams automation ^[25].

Pricing, renewal terms, and ongoing costs

Questions explored

• How much does GoodDay cost per user per month for Microsoft 365 project management?
• Are there setup, onboarding, or cancellation fees with GoodDay?

Published pricing is comparatively transparent but internally inconsistent across sources.

The official pricing page displays a monthly/annual toggle with a stated 30% annual saving, plus separate standard seat bundles such as 10 users at $2.50/user/month ($299 per year) and 15 users at $2.20/user/month ($399 per year) ^[15]. That bundle structure is why the per-user figures require confirmation: the headline rate and the bundle rate are different products.

Additional fees are largely undocumented. OpenAI identified no separately itemized Microsoft Teams, Outlook, SharePoint, or Microsoft identity integration fee in the reviewed public pricing material, but noted that implementation, onboarding, custom API, migration, or integration-development costs are unclear ^[15]. Anthropic reported onboarding fees of $500–$2,000 for Professional/Business and $3,000–$10,000 for Enterprise, plus possible premium support, extra storage, or integration costs that are not formally itemized ^[8]. Those figures are platform-reported and unverified.

Contract terms are thin. The reviewed pricing page does not clearly state cancellation, refund, renewal, seat-reduction, or annual-commitment terms ^[15]. Business includes custom setup, onboarding, and a customer success manager according to the pricing page, but whether these apply to every purchase or are subject to commercial conditions should be verified ^[15]. Anthropic described a month-to-month subscription model typical for SaaS with annual options available and no explicit cancellation penalties documented ^[8]. DeepSeek found contract and cancellation terms not clearly documented ^[2]. Perplexity found contract length, renewal, cancellation, and seat minimums unclear ^[16].

Cost context matters for this buyer. Kimi reported that Microsoft's native tools leverage existing Microsoft 365 subscriptions with minimal incremental cost, with Planner included in most plans and Project Plan 1 adding roughly $10 per user per month, while GoodDay introduces a separate vendor relationship with duplicative per-user costs on top of Microsoft 365 commitments ^[22]. Microsoft Project Plan 3 is listed at approximately $30 per user per month and Plan 5 at approximately $55 per user per month in the same research ^[22]. Those Microsoft figures are platform-reported.

Best Suited For

Questions explored

• Who gets the most value from GoodDay in a Microsoft 365 environment?
• Is GoodDay worth it for mid-market teams that need Gantt charts and time tracking?

GoodDay best suits Microsoft 365 organizations that can accept an external project-management workspace connected to Teams, Outlook, and SharePoint ^[14]. The clearest fit is small and mid-market teams needing Gantt views, time tracking, automation, custom fields, reporting, and API access at a comparatively low published price ^[15].

It also suits teams that need more configurability than Microsoft Planner provides. GoodDay supports unlimited project hierarchy, 20+ views, custom workflows, custom fields, and custom task types ^[6], and includes CRM, finance tracking, HR portal, time tracking, and resource management in unified plans ^[7]. Organizations needing portfolio views, roadmaps, and resource management that exceed Planner's capabilities may find comparable functionality at competitive pricing ^[21].

Hybrid environments are another fit. GoodDay connects Google Workspace, Gmail, Slack, GitHub, GitLab, Dropbox, Box, and 1,300+ apps via Zapier, supporting organizations with tool ecosystems beyond Microsoft 365 alone ^[2]. Teams that mainly need standard two-way Outlook calendar sync and basic Microsoft account login also fall inside the fit envelope ^[12].

Finally, GoodDay suits buyers willing to run a proof of concept. Every platform recommended validating the exact Teams app, permissions, synchronization behavior, and tenant-administration workflow before committing ^[14].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions explored

• Who should not choose GoodDay for microsoft teams and office 365 integrated pm?
• Is GoodDay a poor fit for enterprises that require Microsoft Entra ID governance?

GoodDay is probably not the right choice for organizations that require project management to operate primarily inside the Teams interface rather than in a separate GoodDay workspace ^[14]. Google found the Teams integration restricted to notifications and task creation without a complete interactive embedded dashboard or tab application ^[13], and Kimi described an iframe or container experience rather than native Microsoft data surfaces ^[30].

It is also a weak fit for Microsoft-standardized enterprises requiring clearly documented Entra ID provisioning, conditional access, lifecycle management, audit controls, or comprehensive Office 365 data synchronization ^[14]. Kimi reported that GoodDay requires separate admin consoles outside Microsoft 365 governance and lacks Power Platform extensibility for custom Microsoft ecosystem workflows ^[1].

Buyers prioritizing the lowest integration risk and deepest native Microsoft 365 governance over broad PM configurability and price should look elsewhere ^[14]. So should organizations wanting project management embedded directly in Microsoft Planner, Project for the web, or Lists with Microsoft's native governance ^[2]. Enterprises requiring tight, automated administrative sync with Microsoft 365 user directories without paying for high-tier Enterprise SAML SSO are also a poor match ^[15].

Independent evidence is thin, which raises procurement risk. DeepSeek found third-party review coverage limited, with the G2 profile containing few verified reviews ^[29]. Forbes Advisor raised concerns about security and encryption practices on lower tiers, leaving the depth of administrative data safety on standard plans ambiguous ^[28]. Buyers needing exhaustive independent reviews, analyst coverage, or large-scale Microsoft-stack references should weigh that gap.

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions explored

• What is a better alternative to GoodDay when native Microsoft Teams embedding is required?
• When should a buyer choose Microsoft Planner or Project over GoodDay?

Choose Microsoft Planner or Project for the Web when the buyer requires the most native Microsoft governance, Teams embedding, Entra ID administration, and Microsoft 365 data locality ^[14]. Anthropic's research found Microsoft Planner positioned as best for native ecosystem fit, combining basic task lists, kanban boards, and project schedules directly inside a Teams tab ^[6].

Choose a Microsoft ecosystem-focused product when Teams tabs, Microsoft Graph integration, SharePoint document governance, Power Automate, and tenant-wide administration are decision-critical ^[14]. Kimi reported that Microsoft-native tools render directly within Teams infrastructure with consistent navigation, search, and command interfaces, and are managed through the Microsoft 365 Admin Center, Entra ID, and Power Platform Admin Center with unified audit logs, DLP policies, and conditional access integration ^[1].

Choose Microsoft-native options when portfolio management and resource planning are needed, with Project Plan 3 or Plan 5 as the relevant tiers, or when a Project Online migration is already planned, since Planner Premium is described as the stated successor path ^[21]. Choose Planner when cost minimization on existing Microsoft 365 investment matters, since Planner carries no additional cost versus an additional GoodDay subscription ^[26].

Conversely, choose GoodDay over a Microsoft-native option when the buyer values broader configurable PM views, built-in time tracking, resource, finance, and CRM modules, and lower published subscription pricing more than native Microsoft depth ^[14]. Independent coverage also notes that Teams integrates widely with Microsoft tools but not as strongly with third-party providers, which cuts against third-party tools for Microsoft-first buyers ^[27].

Questions to ask before choosing a provider

Questions explored

• What should a buyer confirm with GoodDay before signing a contract?
• Which Microsoft integration details must be tested in a GoodDay pilot?

The following questions come directly from platform research and should be resolved in writing or in a pilot tenant before purchase.

Teams app scope. Is the Microsoft Teams integration a native Teams app available through the Teams store or tenant app catalog, and which surfaces are supported: personal app, tabs, channels, messaging extensions, bots, and adaptive cards ^[14]? Can users create, edit, comment on, assign, and complete GoodDay tasks entirely within Teams, or are they redirected to GoodDay ^[14]? Does the Teams app support full project management such as boards, Gantt, and workload inside Teams, not just a tab link ^[2]?

Calendar and file behavior. Is Outlook/Microsoft 365 calendar synchronization two-way, and which event types, recurring events, shared calendars, time zones, and conflict rules are supported ^[14]? Does SharePoint integration preserve SharePoint permissions and version history, and does it support OneDrive, SharePoint libraries, and Office coauthoring ^[14]? Can GoodDay read and sync files from SharePoint libraries and OneDrive automatically, or does file integration require manual upload or linking ^[4]?

Identity and administration. Does Microsoft sign-in use Microsoft Entra ID, and does Enterprise include SCIM, group-based provisioning, automatic deprovisioning, conditional-access compatibility, audit logs, and tenant-level administrative controls ^[14]? Is GoodDay manageable from the Microsoft 365 admin center for user provisioning, licensing, and compliance reporting, or is a separate vendor admin portal required ^[2]? Can GoodDay admin tasks be automated through Microsoft Graph or SCIM ^[1]?

Commercial terms. Which Professional, Business, or Enterprise plan includes each Microsoft integration, and are any integrations subject to usage limits or paid add-ons ^[15]? What are the exact US billing terms: minimum seats, annual commitment, renewal, cancellation, refunds, seat reductions, taxes, and overage treatment ^[15]? What is the total cost of ownership for Enterprise including onboarding and premium support for a 500-user organization over three years ^[8]?

Security and compliance. What are the Enterprise security, compliance, data residency, backup, retention, export, SLA, and support commitments ^[15]? Are there data residency or compliance certifications such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or FedRAMP specific to GoodDay's Office 365 integration layer ^[2]? Can GoodDay provide a documented Microsoft 365 integration architecture, permissions list, data-flow diagram, and pilot tenant for validation ^[14]?

The consensus assessment

GoodDay is a mixed fit for Microsoft Teams and Office 365 integrated project management, and that verdict was unanimous across all seven platforms. The case for considering it rests on advertised Microsoft touchpoints, broad configurable project-management functionality, and transparent published pricing of $4–$7 per user per month ^[14]. The case against treating it as a Microsoft-native solution rests on unverified integration depth: no platform confirmed a deeply native Teams app experience, full two-way Office 365 synchronization, or Microsoft Entra ID administrative controls ^[14].

The practical reading is that GoodDay is worth piloting for Microsoft 365 organizations that can operate with an external PM system connected to Teams, Outlook, and SharePoint, and that it is a weaker choice when Teams-first use, deep Office 365 synchronization, or Entra ID administration is non-negotiable ^[14]. Buyers who need the tightest native experience should evaluate Microsoft Planner, Project for the Web, or Lists alongside it ^[2]. This consensus reflects platform agreement on documented evidence, not proof of product quality or performance.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was generated from a structured research run dated 2026-10-02 in which seven AI platforms were asked which providers they would recommend to an IT administrator at a company standardized on Microsoft 365 who wants project management that lives naturally inside Microsoft Teams, syncs with Outlook calendars and OneDrive files, and uses existing Microsoft logins. Each platform returned a fit rating, use-case findings, pricing and terms, limitations, and questions to verify before buying.

GoodDay was named by two of the seven platforms during ranking discovery and was evaluated for this use case by all seven. The report preserves each platform's stated assessment, including disagreements, and cites claims to the platform that supplied them. Company-owned sources materially outnumber independent sources in the underlying evidence, so GoodDay's own descriptions of its Microsoft integrations are reported as company claims rather than independently verified facts.

Research limitations

Several limitations constrain confidence in this review.

Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. DeepSeek's research is dated 2026-06-06 while the run research date is 2026-10-02; platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness ^[2].

Platform mentions count only platforms that named GoodDay during ranking discovery. All seven platforms evaluated fit, but only two named the entity in the ranking stage, so the 28.6% share reflects discovery, not evaluation coverage.

Conflicting product names, pricing, and capabilities were not resolved by guessing. Professional and Business pricing appears as $4/$7 annual and $6/$10 monthly across sources, and the plan-to-SSO mapping conflicts between Google and Kimi ^[15]. Buyers must verify.

The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations, and company claims should not be described as independently verified.

DeepSeek's research was conducted without search enabled, so its pricing and integration findings are model-reported rather than retrieved ^[2]. Independent review coverage for GoodDay is limited, with few verified reviews on G2 ^[29], and Forbes Advisor raised security concerns on lower tiers ^[28].

See the broader microsoft teams and office 365 integrated pm consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Explore more project management and team collaboration software guidance in the category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

1. Microsoft Project Online Service Description: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office365/servicedescriptions/project-online-service-description/microsoft-project-online-service-description
2. GoodDay: Inspiring Work Management Platform: https://www.goodday.work/
3. Best Planview alternatives in 2026 (free and paid) - GoodDay blog: https://www.goodday.work/blog/best-planview-alternatives/
4. Best project management software with calendar integration in 2026 (features & cost compared: https://www.goodday.work/blog/best-project-management-software-with-calendar-integration/
5. Best project management software with email integration in 2026 (features & cost compared: https://www.goodday.work/blog/best-project-management-software-with-email-integration/
6. Best project management software with Microsoft Teams integration in 2026 (features & cost compared: https://www.goodday.work/blog/best-project-management-software-with-microsoft-teams-integration/
7. GoodDay vs Infinity: comparison of features and cost (2026: https://www.goodday.work/blog/goodday-vs-infinity/
8. How much does project management software cost: pricing guide for 2026: https://www.goodday.work/blog/how-much-does-project-management-software-cost/
9. GoodDay vs Nifty Comparison: https://www.goodday.work/compare/goodday-vs-nifty
10. GoodDay Features & Modules Overview: https://www.goodday.work/features
11. GoodDay Help: Overview Integrations: https://www.goodday.work/help/overview-integrations
12. GoodDay Help: What's New: https://www.goodday.work/help/whats-new
13. Apps and Integrations | GoodDay: https://www.goodday.work/integrations
14. GoodDay Modules: https://www.goodday.work/modules
15. Pricing | GoodDay: https://www.goodday.work/pricing
16. Remote Work Management Software - goodday.work: https://www.goodday.work/remote-work
17. Modern Work Plan Comparison for Small and Medium-sized Businesses: https://www.microsoft.com/content/dam/microsoft/final/en-us/microsoft-brand/documents/modern-work-plan-comparison-smb-12-01-2023.pdf

Independent Sources

18. GoodDay vs Productive comparison via SoftwareHope: https://app.softwarehope.com/compare/goodday-vs-productive
19. Microsoft Teams AppSource - GoodDay listing: https://appsource.microsoft.com/en-us/product/office/WA200003127
20. Crozdesk: GoodDay Software Profile & Pricing: https://crozdesk.com/g/goodday
21. Choosing a Project Online Replacement for Your PMO: https://optimumcs.com/insights/project-online-replacement-pmo/
22. Project Management Software Microsoft – Project Management Formula: https://projectmanagementformula.com/project-management-software-microsoft/
23. 10 Best AI Project Portfolio Management Software in 2026: https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-ai-project-portfolio-management-software/
24. 10 Best Team Task Management Software Reviewed In 2026: https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-team-task-management-software/
25. Integrate GoodDay with Microsoft Teams for automation: https://viasocket.com/integrations/goodday/microsftteams
26. Microsoft 365 as a project management platform – Teams, Planner, Loop, Project: https://www.algorcomp.pl/en/knowledge-base/microsoft-365-as-project-management-platform
27. Page 14 | Microsoft Teams Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra: https://www.capterra.com/p/168668/Microsoft-Teams/reviews/?page=14
28. Forbes Advisor: GoodDay Review 2025: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/software/goodday-review/
29. G2 - GoodDay reviews: https://www.g2.com/products/goodday/reviews
30. Office 365 Project Management: Complete Guide 2026: https://www.virtosoftware.com/pm/office-365-project-management/
31. GoodDay.work Microsoft Teams Integration - Quick Connect - Zapier: https://zapier.com/apps/gooddaywork/integrations/microsoft-teams