Independent research. A clearer software perspective.
Business SoftwareConsensus Index

PROVIDER FIT REVIEWProject Management & Team Collaboration Software

Monday.com Review: Marketing Agency Client Projects

com is evaluated for marketing agency client project management, covering buyer fit, pricing, strengths, limitations, and purchase considerations.

STUDY SNAPSHOTRecorded recommendations · not product testing
Research date
October 1, 2026
Usable AI responses
7
Consensus position
#6
Source URLs in evidence
61

RECOMMENDATION COVERAGE

Monday.com

Recommended by 3 of 7 AI platforms in this study.

42.9%Consensus coverage · not a customer rating

The research in brief

Monday.com is a good fit for marketing agency client project management when the agency needs flexible multi-client boards, campaign timelines, client-facing guest access, budget-versus-spend calculations, and team workload visibility in one configurable workspace. Three of seven platforms named Monday.com during the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 4.33 and a best rank of 2. The strongest reason to consider it is its combination of agency-specific templates, Pro-plan workload and formula features, and unlimited guest access on Pro. The main limitation is that retainer accounting, invoicing, profitability reporting, and utilization dashboards are not native - they require custom configuration, integrations, or separate tools.

Research Snapshot

FieldValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank4.33
Best listed rank2
Software offeringmonday work management, Pro plan (agency client-project workflows)
Overall use-case fitGood
Research date2026-10-01

Why Monday.com Qualified for This Study

Questions explored

  • Is Monday.com a good choice for marketing agency client project management?
  • Why did only 3 of 7 AI platforms name Monday.com in the ranking stage?

Monday.com qualified because three of the seven included platforms - Anthropic, DeepSeek, and Perplexity - named it during ranking discovery for marketing agency client project management, meeting the two-mention minimum. Its listed ranks were 2 (Anthropic), 6 (DeepSeek), and 5 (Perplexity), producing an average rank of 4.33 and a best rank of 2. The platform was evaluated by all seven included platforms at the fit stage, and every one of those seven rated it either "good" (six platforms) or "mixed" (Kimi) for this use case.

The qualification rests on documented capability rather than ranking volume. Monday.com markets creative and agency workflows for tracking client projects, tasks, billing, team workload, and project status [12], and publishes a Client Campaigns for Agencies template supporting client organization, campaign tracking, forms, approvals, workload management, and integrations [11]. It also publishes a broad template library covering project, campaign, portfolio, and content-calendar use cases [7].

The ranking-stage label was inconsistent across platforms. Some platforms referred to "monday work management," others to "monday.com for Agencies (Pro plan)," and others to "monday.com with Work OS platform for agencies." The public materials reviewed present agency workflows primarily as monday work management templates and use cases rather than a separately documented agency product SKU, so buyers should treat "monday.com for Agencies" as positioning around standard plans until confirmed in a purchase order.

The software offering in focus

Questions explored

  • Which Monday.com plan should a marketing agency choose for client project management?
  • Is monday work management the same product as monday.com for Agencies?

The relevant offering is monday work management on the Pro plan, configured for agency client-project workflows. Six of the seven platforms converged on Pro as the minimum tier for agency needs; Kimi described Pro as the plan tier with Standard as the practical floor for agency features [40].

Pro is the tier where the agency-relevant capabilities concentrate. The Pro plan includes Workload View [16], time tracking [20], and formula columns for budget and spend calculations [21]. Automations and integrations are available from Standard upward, but Pro raises the allowance to 25,000 automation actions and 25,000 integration actions per month [22]. Enterprise adds expanded portfolio oversight, governance, reporting, and resource-management capabilities [14].

The "monday.com for Agencies" label appears in platform outputs but is not clearly documented as a distinct product SKU in the checked materials. Perplexity explicitly flagged this as unresolved, asking whether it refers to a formal package, a services bundle, or marketing language around Work OS usage [30]. Buyers should confirm the exact product name and included features in the order form.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions explored

  • What do AI platforms agree Monday.com does well for marketing agency client project management?
  • Does Monday.com support client-facing views and campaign timelines for agencies?

Agreement was strong, though not unanimous, on five capabilities.

Multi-client organization through boards and templates. OpenAI, DeepSeek, Perplexity, Grok, and Google all described Monday.com as supporting separate boards, dashboards, templates, and client-project workflows [12]. The Client Campaigns for Agencies template is designed to centralize client campaigns, requests, approvals, and campaign tracking [11].

Campaign timeline management. Timeline views and widgets display dates, milestones, and timelines across projects [28]. Marketing and client-campaign templates include campaign tracking, timeline views, request intake, and approval workflows [10]. Anthropic counted 12+ marketing templates including Client Campaigns for Agencies, Campaign Planning, Content Calendar, and Marketing Activities [8]. Grok cited 200+ templates including campaign calendars, content trackers, and creative workflows [56].

Team workload visibility. The Pro plan includes Workload View [16]. Workload widgets can aggregate assignments from multiple boards and use people plus date or timeline fields to show capacity and overload [26]. Anthropic noted 15+ dashboard widgets for tracking project progress, budget, and teammate workload [19].

Client-facing guest access. Shareable boards and dashboards can be used with external guests, including clients [18]. Guests are available on Standard and above and unlimited on Pro and Enterprise [18]. Anthropic reported unlimited guest access on Pro at no additional seat cost [50]. Google described a 4:1 guest-to-member seat calculation on Standard, with unlimited guests on Pro [32].

Budget-versus-spend calculation through configurable fields. Agencies can track planned budget, actual spend, remaining budget, hourly rates, and billable time using number, formula, and time-tracking columns [15]. Independent coverage describes Budget Plan, Cost Estimate, and Cost Comparison templates for variance analysis [42].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions explored

  • Does Monday.com have native retainer tracking and invoicing for agencies?
  • How many concurrent clients can a marketing agency manage in Monday.com before it becomes unwieldy?

Four material disagreements or uncertainties emerged.

Retainer and invoicing support. Company materials discuss retainer workflow templates and budget tracking [15], but independent reviews state that Monday.com lacks a native process for turning tracked hours into invoices and that retainer management typically requires workarounds [54]. Google reported that automated invoice generation is not completely native to monday Work Management alone and requires a bundle with monday CRM or third-party tools such as QuickBooks [33]. Kimi stated flatly that native invoicing is absent from the core platform [40]. This is a genuine conflict between company-owned and independent evidence, and it is unresolved in the supplied materials.

Client portal versus guest access. Monday.com documentation refers to guest access as client-facing sharing [18]. Independent reviews distinguish guest access - direct board access inside the monday.com interface - from a true branded client portal with restricted, self-service views [38]. Anthropic noted that guests see full board structure including groups, columns, and other items [38]. No official Monday.com branded client portal feature was found in the checked materials.

Workspace limits at scale. Anthropic reported that the Pro plan is limited to 15 workspaces and that agencies managing 50+ clients via a one-client-per-workspace model exceed documented best practices [52]. Other platforms did not confirm or contradict this specific limit. Kimi described structural decay at roughly 40+ clients because Monday.com lacks a native client object [40]. DeepSeek and Perplexity did not quantify a client ceiling.

Exact United States Pro pricing. Anthropic, Grok, Google, and Kimi all reported $19 per seat per month on annual billing and $24 on monthly billing [53]. OpenAI stated that the exact current United States Pro price was not reliably extractable from the public pricing page during its assessment and should be verified directly [5]. DeepSeek marked its pricing confidence as low and did not confirm 2026 figures [5]. Perplexity noted that public pricing snippets vary across pages and regions [5]. Anthropic also reported a February 2026 price increase from $16 to $19 per seat with no grandfathering applied at renewal [50].

Features for this workload

Questions explored

  • Does Monday.com track retainer budgets and billable hours for agency client work?
  • Can a marketing agency give clients restricted access to only their own Monday.com boards?

The five category criteria break down as follows.

CriterionAssessmentKey evidence
Multi-client workspace organization
Advantage, with scale caveats
Boards, workspaces, folders, connected boards [2]; Pro limited to 15 workspaces per Anthropic [52]
Budget and retainer tracking
Configurable, not native
Number, formula, and time-tracking columns [15]; no native retainer ledger or invoicing [54]
Client-facing views
Advantage, with portal caveats
Shareable boards and dashboards with guests [18]; guests see full board structure [38]
Campaign timeline templates
Advantage
Timeline views and widgets [28]; Client Campaigns for Agencies and Marketing Activities templates [11]
Team workload visibility
Advantage
Pro includes Workload View [16]; workload widgets aggregate multiple boards [26]

Two operational limitations matter for agencies. Time tracking is a column-based capability on Pro and Enterprise; active timer sessions are not committed until paused or stopped, and time-tracking data does not transfer between boards through automation [20]. Automation and integration consumption is capped by monthly action allowances, and complex recipes can consume multiple actions [22].

Kimi raised a structural point that other platforms did not: Monday.com has no native "client" object, so agencies model clients as rows, boards, or groups with no standardized structure, which creates maintenance burden and data decay as client count grows [40]. This is a single-platform finding and should be treated as platform-reported rather than consensus.

Pricing, renewal terms, and ongoing costs

Questions explored

  • How much does Monday.com Pro cost per seat per month for a marketing agency?
  • Are there setup, overage, or cancellation fees on a Monday.com agency subscription?

Pricing is seat-based and varies by product, plan, team size, and billing frequency. The public pricing page confirms that monday work management has a free plan, a 14-day Pro trial, paid plans starting at three users, monthly billing, and quote-based pricing for accounts above 40 users [5]. Support documentation describes bucket pricing with a minimum of three seats and monthly or yearly subscriptions [30]. Annual billing is paid upfront and carries a discount over monthly [30].

Reported per-seat rates across platforms:

PlanAnnual (reported)Monthly (reported)Source
Basic
$9/seat/month
$12/seat/month
Standard
$12/seat/month
$14/seat/month
Pro
$19/seat/month
$24/seat/month
Enterprise
Custom quote
Custom quote

Anthropic reported a February 2026 price increase that raised Pro from $16 to $19 per seat, a 19% increase, with no grandfathering applied at subscription renewal [50]. Anthropic also reported that seats are purchased in blocks of five above the three-seat minimum and that the Pro minimum is $57 per month on annual billing [53]. Google reported that unused seats within a bundle tier are non-refundable [45].

Additional cost items reported by platforms:

  • Monday CRM is a separate product priced at approximately $12 to $28 per seat per month with its own three-seat minimum [54].
  • External time-tracking tools such as Harvest or Toggl typically add $10 to $15 per user per month [53].
  • External invoicing tools such as QuickBooks or FreshBooks typically add $30 to $100+ per month [53].
  • Third-party client portal applications are not included and cost varies [57].
  • AI features may use separate AI-credit allowances or usage-based purchasing; Grok cited AI credit overage at roughly $0.01 per credit [59].

Contract and cancellation terms were not fully established in the checked public sources. Monthly billing is available [5]. OpenAI stated that the checked public sources did not establish a complete cancellation, refund, renewal, or annual-contract policy for monday work management [5]. DeepSeek stated that cancellation and refund specifics are governed by Monday.com's terms and should be verified directly [5]. Perplexity reported that annual purchases are paid upfront and that specific cancellation and refund terms were not clearly verified [30].

Best Suited For

Questions explored

  • What size marketing agency gets the most value from Monday.com Pro?
  • Is Monday.com a good fit for an agency that needs client-facing campaign visibility?

Monday.com is best suited to small and midsize marketing or creative agencies managing multiple concurrent client campaigns who want configurable client-project templates rather than highly prescriptive workflows [12]. It fits teams that need client-facing boards or dashboards with controlled external access, and agencies that need workload visibility, time tracking, budget-versus-spend calculations, and campaign timelines in one platform [16].

Anthropic scoped the sweet spot more narrowly, describing agencies managing 5 to 15 concurrent client campaigns with visual timeline and status tracking needs, and teams comfortable using integrations such as Harvest or QuickBooks for time tracking and invoicing separate from Monday.com [53]. Kimi described the strongest fit as social, content, and creative teams under roughly 15 people with board-shaped work and dedicated ops staff to build and maintain custom workflows [40].

Google emphasized agencies that need highly customizable dashboards to report project progress to account directors, and teams that need strong custom task automation pipelines [49].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions explored

  • Who should not choose Monday.com for marketing agency client project management?
  • Is Monday.com a poor fit for agencies that need native retainer accounting?

Monday.com is probably not the best choice for agencies whose primary requirement is purpose-built retainer accounting, invoicing, revenue recognition, or project profitability reporting [5]. It is also a weak fit for large agencies requiring portfolio governance, advanced resource planning, granular permissions, or enterprise reporting without upgrading to Enterprise [14].

Additional poor-fit profiles reported across platforms:

  • Agencies managing 50+ concurrent client accounts via a one-client-per-workspace model, due to reported Pro workspace limits and governance complexity [52].
  • Agencies requiring a branded client portal with restricted data visibility and self-service intake forms without third-party integration [57].
  • Teams seeking a lightweight task list with minimal configuration or administration [5].
  • Very small agencies of one or two people who do not want to pay for a three-seat minimum [45].
  • Multi-department performance agencies with PPC, analytics, and non-board workflows [40].
  • Teams without dedicated setup or maintenance resources [40].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions explored

  • What is a better alternative to Monday.com for an agency that needs native retainer billing?
  • When should a marketing agency choose a PSA tool instead of Monday.com?

Platforms named several alternative scenarios. Anthropic suggested purpose-built agency management platforms when retainer billing, estimates, utilization, profitability, invoices, and client financial reporting are core requirements, and more specialized resource-management or professional-services platforms when advanced capacity planning across many teams is needed [54]. Anthropic also named Asana Premium, Kantata/Mavenlink, and AgencyBloc as candidates for native retainer hour tracking, utilization dashboards, and automated time-to-invoice conversion [54].

Kimi named Teamwork.com Accelerate at $24.99 per user per month and Corcava for unified time, budget, and invoicing; Thicket at $49 per month flat for three-to-25-person agencies that do not bill through the tool; and ClickUp Business at roughly $12 per user per month equivalent when scaled [58]. Grok suggested Productive for native retainer hour tracking and profitability reporting, and Wrike or Teamwork.com for advanced proofing or resource management [56].

Perplexity framed the decision as a trade-off: choose a finance-forward PM or PSA tool when retainer budgets, utilization, and invoicing must be tightly managed in one system, and choose a simpler project tool when the agency primarily needs lightweight task tracking [43]. DeepSeek recommended comparing against agency-specific tools when native retainer accounting with automated burn-down and invoicing is required [5].

These alternatives are platform-reported suggestions, not independently benchmarked comparisons. Pricing figures for alternatives come from the platforms' own cited sources and were not verified in this study.

Questions to ask before choosing a provider

Questions explored

  • What should a marketing agency confirm with Monday.com before signing a contract?
  • How should an agency test Monday.com against its retainer and client-count requirements?

The platforms collectively raised verification items that map to the unresolved conflicts above.

Pricing and contract terms: confirm the exact United States price for the required number of paid seats on the Pro plan under monthly and annual billing [5]. Confirm whether annual subscriptions auto-renew and what the cancellation, refund, downgrade, and data-export terms are [5]. Confirm whether the February 2026 price increase applies at your renewal and whether any grandfathering is available [50].

Client and guest billing: confirm whether clients, freelancers, viewers, and guests are billed under the proposed account structure and how many external users can be added without charge [18]. Confirm whether each client can be restricted to only that client's boards, dashboard widgets, files, and updates [29].

Retainer and financial modeling: confirm whether retainer periods, rollover hours, prepaid amounts, burn rates, write-offs, and overage approvals can be modeled without custom development [15]. Confirm whether billable time and budget data can be exported cleanly to your accounting or invoicing system [54].

Scale and limits: confirm your workspace strategy if you manage more than 25 concurrent clients and test navigation at scale during a trial [52]. Confirm what happens when the account exceeds the monthly automation or integration action limit [22].

Plan feature boundaries: confirm which workload, time-tracking, dashboard, portfolio, and permission features are included in Pro versus Enterprise [16]. Confirm which integrations are native and which require third-party marketplace applications or separate subscriptions [23].

Security and data handling: confirm whether the agency can receive a data-processing, security, and permission review suitable for confidential client campaign information [34].

The consensus assessment

Monday.com earns a good fit rating for marketing agency client project management across six of seven platforms, with Kimi rating it mixed. The consensus is that it is a strong operational workspace for organizing many client campaigns, deadlines, approvals, budgets, workloads, and client views, and that it should be shortlisted by agencies that value configurability and visual cross-client coordination.

The consensus is equally clear that it is not a standalone agency operating system. Retainer accounting, invoicing, revenue recognition, profitability reporting, and utilization dashboards are not native capabilities in the checked materials, and agencies needing those functions should plan for custom configuration, integrations, or separate tools. Client-facing access works through guest sharing rather than a branded portal, and guests see full board structure.

Buyers should verify current Pro pricing directly, confirm the product name and included features in the order form, test workspace organization at their actual client count, and model the total cost including any CRM, time-tracking, invoicing, or portal add-ons before committing.

How This Review Was Produced

This review synthesizes fit-research responses from seven AI platforms - Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google, Grok, Kimi, OpenAI, and Perplexity - each asked which providers they would recommend to a small marketing and creative agency owner juggling a dozen client accounts with separate retainer hours, campaign deadlines, and creative deliverables. Three of the seven platforms named Monday.com during ranking discovery, meeting the two-mention inclusion threshold. All seven evaluated Monday.com at the fit stage.

The study date is 2026-10-01. Platform-reported research dates were 2026-10-01 for Anthropic, Google, Grok, Kimi, OpenAI, and Perplexity, and 2026-06-11 for DeepSeek. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations in the supplied catalog, so company claims should not be described as independently verified. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.

Research limitations

Several limitations constrain this review.

Evidence ownership imbalance. The supplied citation catalog contains 35 company-owned sources, 25 independent sources, and one source of unclear ownership. Findings resting primarily on company-owned documentation - templates, plan features, guest access, workload widgets - are company-reported rather than independently confirmed.

Unresolved pricing conflict. OpenAI stated the exact United States Pro price was not reliably extractable from the public pricing page, while Anthropic, Grok, Google, and Kimi reported $19 per seat per month on annual billing. DeepSeek marked its pricing confidence as low. The exact checkout price for a United States buyer cannot be fully verified from the checked sources.

Unresolved product-naming conflict. The ranking-stage label refers to both monday work management and monday.com for Agencies. Perplexity explicitly asked whether "monday.com for Agencies" refers to a formal package, a services bundle, or marketing language. Public support materials also changed product naming during 2026, including references to monday AI work platform and monday work management.

Unresolved retainer-support conflict. Company materials discuss retainer workflow templates, while independent reviews state that Monday.com has no native retainer management and no native process for turning tracked hours into invoices. It is unclear whether retainer templates constitute purpose-built retainer support or generic custom board workarounds.

Unresolved client-portal conflict. Monday.com documentation refers to guest access as client-facing sharing, while independent reviews distinguish guest access from a true branded client portal. No official branded client portal feature was found.

Unresolved workspace-limit conflict. Anthropic reported a 15-workspace limit on Pro. Other platforms did not confirm or contradict this. Ultimate and Enterprise workspace limits were unclear in the checked materials.

Unverified performance claims. No independent source was found in the checked materials validating specific customer-outcome percentages or Monday.com's claimed efficiency improvements for marketing agencies. Public marketing claims about efficiency or budget improvements are company-reported.

Platform-reported research dates differ from the study date. DeepSeek's research date was 2026-06-11, roughly four months before the 2026-10-01 study date. DeepSeek also ran with search disabled, so its claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts.

No personal testing. This review reflects platform-reported research only. No hands-on product testing, customer interviews, or independent verification was performed.

AI-platform agreement is not proof of quality. That six of seven platforms rated Monday.com a good fit indicates convergence in the supplied responses, not verified product performance.

See the broader Marketing and Creative Agencies Managing Client Work consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Explore more project management and team collaboration software guidance in the category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  1. monday.com | A new way of working: https://monday.com/
  2. Tools for digital marketing agency: complete guide to success in 2026: https://monday.com/blog/project-management/tools-for-digital-marketing-agency/
  3. monday.com Features: https://monday.com/features
  4. monday.com pricing and plans: https://monday.com/pricing
  5. Monday Service Pricing: https://monday.com/service/pricing
  6. Customizable templates: https://monday.com/templates
  7. Marketing templates to help your team drive impact: https://monday.com/templates/category/marketing
  8. Intuitive Client Management Template | monday.com: https://monday.com/templates/client-manager
  9. monday.com Help Center: https://support.monday.com/hc/en-us

Independent Sources

  1. Monday.com for advertising agencies: managing 50+ client campaigns: https://advaiya.com/how-advertising-agencies-use-monday/
  2. Asana vs Monday vs ClickUp vs Corcava for Agencies (2026 Comparison: https://corcava.com/blog/asana-vs-monday-vs-clickup-vs-corcava
  3. How to share monday.com boards with external users and guests · Gorilla Apps: https://getgorilla.app/blog/how-to-share-your-monday-com-boards-with-external-users-and-guests
  4. Monday.com Agency Workflow Template: 7 Proven Steps: https://mysoftwarestack.com/monday-com-agency-workflow-template-2/
  5. Monday.com for marketing agencies: the honest review: https://phloz.com/blog/monday-for-agencies-honest-review
  6. Teamwork Review 2026: Features, Pricing, Pros & Cons: https://saascrmreview.com/teamwork-review/
  7. How to Use monday.com for Financial Management: Budgets, Tracking, and Reporting: https://stiltsoft.com/blog/how-to-use-monday-com-for-financial-management/
  8. ClickUp Review: The Honest Assessment for US Marketing Agencies Running Client Delivery: https://thestackarchitects.com/clickup-review/
  9. Monday.com Pricing 2026: Plans, Costs & Automation Limits: https://www.activepieces.com/blog/monday-com-pricing-2026-plans-costs-automation-limits
  10. Monday.com Pricing 2026: Plans, Costs & What You'll Actually Pay: https://www.pmworld360.com/monday-com-pricing-breakdown-2026/
  11. Agency Management Software: Best ClickUp & Monday Alternative: https://www.ravetree.com/blog/agency-management-software-alternatives-to-clickup-and-monday
  12. 8 Best Project Management Software for Marketing Agencies (2026: https://www.rock.so/blog/project-management-software-marketing-agencies
  13. 7 Best Project Management Software for Marketing Agencies (2026: https://www.saasworthy.com/blog/project-management-software-for-marketing-agencies
  14. monday.com Client Portal Forms: The Feature That Doesn't Exist: https://www.taskrhino.ca/blog/monday-com-client-portal-forms-for-external-users/
  15. Creative Agency Project Management Software: $49/mo Flat: https://www.thickethq.com/agency-project-management
  16. monday.com Pricing in 2026: Real Per-Seat Costs and the 3-Seat Minimum: https://www.usecarly.com/blog/monday-pricing/

Other Sources

  1. Marketing campaign templates that power repeatable success 2026: https://monday.com/blog/project-management/marketing-campaign-templates/

TRANSPARENCY BY DESIGN

The evidence behind this study

Research is a dated snapshot of AI recommendations and their supporting sources. Use the original evidence and methodology to understand what these findings can and cannot tell you.

Independent source records
25
Provider-owned source records
35
Direct support records
43

AI platforms in the study

ChatGPTClaudeDeepSeekGrokPerplexityKimiGemini

Study limitations

  • The study date identifies this research snapshot; dates reported by AI platforms do not independently establish source freshness.
  • Recommendation counts measure mentions during the ranking stage. Later fit assessments do not increase those counts.
  • Product names, costs, and features can differ across sources. Confirm conflicting details directly with the provider.
  • Source URLs came from AI platform responses and were not independently validated during report preparation.
  • Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations; do not describe company claims as independently verified.
  • Some dates reported by AI platforms differ from the study date. Those dates do not independently establish that the information is current.

Affiliate & commercial disclosure

We may receive compensation when you follow certain links, subscribe to a software plan, or take another qualifying action through a commercial partner. These relationships create a potential financial conflict, but do not influence recorded AI recommendations or ranking calculations. Partner availability, pricing, features, and service terms can vary.

Read the full Affiliate Disclosure for compensation, tracking, partner availability, and research independence details, or contact us with a disclosure question.

Verify the source snapshot

SHA-256: 331fbae84b0a9b55fad021db3a4eb226b85976e976a8521b77db631cd9359326