PostHog Review: SaaS Lifecycle Email

The research in brief

PostHog is a good fit for SaaS teams that want onboarding, activation, upgrade, and churn-prevention emails triggered directly from in-product behavior, provided the team is engineering-led and already comfortable with event instrumentation. Two of the seven platforms in this study named PostHog during the ranking stage (DeepSeek, Kimi), with an average listed rank of 1.5 and a best rank of 1. The strongest reason to consider it is that PostHog Workflows runs on the same events, person properties, cohorts, and feature flags already collected for product analytics, so lifecycle emails can fire without a separate marketing data pipeline ^[15]. The main limitation is maturity: Workflows entered beta in November 2025, the email builder is described as basic, and sending is capped by reputation-based tiers ^[7].

Research Snapshot

Why PostHog Qualified for This Study

Questions explored

• Why did PostHog qualify for a product-led lifecycle email study when only two platforms named it?
• Is PostHog a legitimate contender for SaaS lifecycle emails, or did it qualify only as a niche analytics tool?

PostHog qualified because it satisfies the study's five category criteria in a single system rather than through integrations. The research prompt asked for deep product-usage event integration, sophisticated behavioral triggers, ready-made trial and churn lifecycle templates, developer-friendly event tracking, and the ability to pair email with in-app messages. PostHog addresses each: Workflows use existing project events and person properties ^[15]; the builder supports triggers, delays, audience splits, message sends, and PostHog actions ^[15]; the platform ships an "onboarding started but not completed" workflow template ^[29]; SDKs support custom event capture across web, mobile, and backend environments ^[13]; and Surveys and Feature Flags sit alongside Workflows in the same product suite ^[9].

Qualification here reflects topical relevance to the research prompt, not a quality endorsement. Only two of seven platforms named PostHog during ranking discovery, so its inclusion rests on a minority of platform responses. The ranking-stage identity details were flagged as unverified in the deterministic audit, and one platform's official-site retrieval failed, so the reported domain was retained but remains unverified.

The software offering in focus

Questions explored

• Which PostHog product should a SaaS team buy for product-led lifecycle emails?
• Is PostHog Workflows enough on its own, or does a buyer also need PostHog Product Analytics?

PostHog Workflows is the relevant product. It is the automation layer that sends email, SMS, webhooks, and destination dispatches based on product data already inside a PostHog project ^[31]. Every platform that named PostHog pointed to Workflows or to Workflows combined with the wider suite.

Workflows is not sold as a standalone email tool. It runs on the events, person properties, cohorts, feature flags, and experiment results already in the PostHog project, with no separate marketing dataset required ^[8]. That means a buyer who does not already send product events to PostHog is effectively adopting an analytics platform in order to use the email automation layer. PostHog's own comparison material frames Workflows as a no-code builder for product-led teams that runs on events and person properties already in PostHog ^[8].

The broader suite matters to the buying decision because the pairing features depend on it. Surveys and Feature Flags are listed as platform products, and Workflows can execute PostHog actions ^[9]. One platform described the relevant plan as PostHog Cloud on usage-based pricing with Workflows for lifecycle automation ^[9].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions explored

• What do multiple AI platforms agree PostHog does well for product-led lifecycle emails?
• Does PostHog trigger lifecycle emails from real product events rather than form fills?

The clearest agreement is that PostHog triggers lifecycle messages from first-party product events rather than from form fills or CRM fields. Six of the seven platforms described this as an advantage, and the seventh (Grok) rated the overall fit "strong." Workflows use the same events and person properties already collected for product analytics, so email triggers and audience decisions can use live product behavior ^[15]. Every click, session, or conversion tracked in PostHog can start a workflow ^[31]. Workflows trigger directly on PostHog events, cohorts, and person properties with no external sync required ^[31].

Platforms also agreed on developer-friendly instrumentation. PostHog provides SDKs and APIs for capturing custom events and identifying users ^[13], supports autocapture of clicks, pageviews, and form submissions without a predefined schema ^[41], and models data as events, properties, and persons with resolved identities ^[33].

A third area of agreement is consolidation. Multiple platforms noted that analytics, feature flags, surveys, and messaging sit in one usage-priced system, which removes the analytics-to-email pipeline ^[2]. One platform summarized this as eliminating sync latency and cost ^[31].

Agreement among AI platforms does not establish product quality. Most supporting citations are company-owned PostHog documentation, and no platform supplied independent deliverability testing or conversion benchmarks.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions explored

• Do AI platforms disagree about whether PostHog Workflows is production-ready for lifecycle email?
• Is PostHog's email builder good enough for marketing teams, or do reviewers consider it basic?

Platforms diverged on maturity. One platform cited PostHog's changelog stating Workflows entered beta in November 2025 and treated beta status as a meaningful change-management risk for mission-critical lifecycle programs ^[7]. Another cited a PostHog blog tag showing Workflows actively published in April 2026 ^[4]. A third described Workflows as generally available in December 2025 (Evidence ID anthropic:22-10 context). These dates conflict, and the deterministic audit instructs that conflicting product names, pricing, and capabilities should be described rather than resolved by guessing.

Platforms also diverged on email builder quality. One independent review called the visual email editor the weakest compared with Kit, ActiveCampaign, and HubSpot builders ^[42]. Another independent review noted the builder has room for improvement while praising testing features ^[48]. PostHog's own handbook acknowledges Workflows is new and not as feature-rich as mature marketing automation, and that teams expecting advanced sequencing or complex branching may find gaps ^[22].

Template depth is genuinely uncertain. One platform found a pre-built "onboarding started but not completed" template ^[29] and PostHog AI prompts for welcome, re-engagement, feature announcement, and upgrade emails ^[17]. Another platform reviewed public documentation and found no prebuilt library of trial-conversion or churn-prevention templates comparable to dedicated vendors ^[15]. A third found published onboarding and lifecycle email playbooks covering onboarding, long-running onboarding, waitlist/alpha/beta onboarding, activation, and retention flows ^[24]. The honest reading is that some templates and playbooks exist, but no platform established a comprehensive turnkey library.

In-app messaging pairing drew mixed findings. One platform said PostHog's suite includes Surveys and Feature Flags and that workflows can trigger PostHog actions, supporting coordinated in-product interventions, while noting no dedicated in-app lifecycle messaging product was verified ^[9]. Another said surveys are the primary in-product messaging mechanism and full overlay or popup messaging is not a core capability ^[9]. A third said in-app messaging pairing was not clearly confirmed in retrieved sources ^[31].

Features for this workload

Questions explored

• Does PostHog support the behavioral triggers, delays, and exit conditions a SaaS lifecycle email program needs?
• Can PostHog pair lifecycle email with in-app messages, surveys, and feature flags in one journey?

Behavioral triggers are the strongest capability. The workflow builder supports triggers, delays, audience splits, message sends, and PostHog actions ^[15]. Documented trigger types include event, webhook, tracking-pixel, manual, and scheduled triggers ^[7]. Workflows can define conversion goals that automatically exit users once they complete a desired in-product action such as upgrading a plan ^[43]. Frequency options distinguish once-per-user from every-event execution ^[43].

Email execution covers reusable personalized templates, conversion goals, recurring broadcasts, test sends, and reporting for sent, delivered, opened, clicked, and converted recipients ^[16]. A broadcast is a one-email workflow, while multi-step workflows can add delays, conditions, and additional messages ^[16]. PostHog AI can generate email templates from user prompts for upgrade, churn prevention, welcome, re-engagement, and feature announcement use cases ^[17].

Trial and churn coverage is partial. PostHog documents a trial-account review workflow example using a scheduled cohort, recent product behavior, feature usage, friction, and errors ^[7], and publishes an onboarding-drop-off template ^[29]. One platform described AI prompts for churn prevention based on usage drop or inactivity ^[17]. But the checked sources do not establish a broad turnkey library, and one platform found none comparable to dedicated vendors ^[15].

In-app pairing is limited. Surveys can be triggered from product events and responses auto-summarized, enabling feedback loops on why users churned or abandoned onboarding ^[47]. Workflows integrate with feature flags and experiments so emails can fire based on experiment results or flag assignment ^[4]. One platform noted PostHog lacks native in-app guides, checklists, or tooltips (Evidence ID google:cit_workflows_launch context). Another said sophisticated in-app UX would require pairing with a separate tool (Evidence ID anthropic:42-7 context).

Data movement is a genuine strength. PostHog documents imports from Stripe, HubSpot, Salesforce, Postgres, BigQuery, and S3, and realtime destinations including HubSpot, Intercom, Slack, and webhooks ^[11]. One platform noted PostHog's CDP can route events to email platforms, though PostHog recommends using Workflows natively when possible ^[46].

Pricing, renewal terms, and ongoing costs

Questions explored

• How much does PostHog Workflows cost per email after the free tier, and is there a monthly minimum?
• Are there setup, service, or cancellation fees a SaaS buyer should budget for with PostHog?

PostHog uses per-product usage-based pricing with a non-expiring free tier. The free allowance includes 10,000 workflow messages per channel per month ^[27]. Above that, one platform cited PostHog's Workflows pricing page at $0.003 per email with volume discounts ^[32], and an independent review described tiered pricing from $0.003 down to $0.00025 per email at scale ^[38]. One platform reported the checked public pricing page exposed the free allowance but not a clearly displayed per-message paid rate (Evidence ID openai:c10 context). Buyers should confirm the current rate directly.

Standard pricing carries no minimum spend or annual contract, supports product-level billing limits, and permits cancellation by setting a billing limit, with usage charged through the cancellation point ^[27]. One platform noted alert emails at 80% and 100% of usage limits, and that reaching a billing limit stops data ingestion (Evidence ID anthropic:22-10 context). Another reported month-to-month terms with no long-term contract mentioned and startup and non-profit discounts available ^[27].

Optional costs exist. A 30-minute expert consultation is advertised at $80, and broader expert services are custom-priced with a stated $5,000 minimum, usually around 20% of first-year credit purchase ^[28]. Prepaid plans with discounts typically carry 12-month terms, order forms, and Net 30 by default ^[10]. One platform listed platform packages as add-ons for team features such as RBAC, SSO, and dedicated support, stacked on top of usage charges (Evidence ID anthropic:22-10 context). Prices are in U.S. dollars and exclude taxes ^[27].

Cost variability is the practical risk. Because Workflows pricing stacks on top of product analytics event pricing, total spend scales with both event volume and message volume ^[39]. One platform warned that identified event costs can rise quickly if users are always logged in (Evidence ID anthropic:22-10 context). Another noted the reviewed public pages did not fully verify taxes, overage handling, or ancillary enterprise fees ^[27].

Best Suited For

Questions explored

• Who gets the most value from PostHog for product-led lifecycle emails?
• Is PostHog a good choice for an engineering-led SaaS team already using PostHog analytics?

PostHog fits engineering-led SaaS teams that already send product events to PostHog and want lifecycle emails without maintaining a separate behavioral marketing pipeline. The strongest fit is onboarding, activation, trial-expiry, feature-adoption, and usage-based churn interventions ^[15].

It also suits teams that want email paired with in-product changes. Workflows can coordinate feature flags, surveys, and webhooks alongside email steps ^[9]. One platform described the fit as strong for SaaS teams already using PostHog for analytics and feature flags ^[6].

Early-stage and mid-market products benefit from the free tier and billing limits, which reduce initial cost and overage risk ^[27]. One platform noted the free tier covers 1M analytics events, 5K session recordings, 1M feature flag requests, and 10K workflow messages per month ^[45].

Teams comfortable owning event instrumentation are the natural buyers. PostHog is designed around event and person-property data already sent to the platform, with SDK-based collection positioned as a core capability ^[9]. One platform described the fit as best for growth engineers and technical product marketers looking to bypass third-party data syncs (Evidence ID google:cit_workflows_launch context).

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions explored

• Who should not choose PostHog for SaaS product-led lifecycle emails?
• Is PostHog a poor fit for marketing-first teams that need advanced sequencing and deliverability controls?

Marketing-first teams expecting advanced sequencing, lead scoring, complex branching, or sophisticated suppression logic are not the target buyer. PostHog's own handbook states Workflows is new and not as feature-rich as mature marketing automation, and that teams expecting advanced sequencing or complex branching may find gaps ^[22]. One platform said PostHog is not the right primary tool for enterprise demand-gen teams with complex lead scoring and email nurture ^[22].

High-volume senders face real constraints. Workflow email uses shared sending infrastructure, and new projects start at sending tier 0 with documented caps of 50 emails per hour, 100 per day, and a 100-person batch audience, with tiers increasing based on sending health ^[18]. One platform noted dedicated email platforms have spent years on deliverability, template management, suppression handling, and sending reputation, and a beta platform does not close that gap on day one ^[44].

Teams needing transactional email as a primary function should look elsewhere. One platform stated PostHog is not designed for high-volume transactional sending such as password resets, receipts, and alerts (Evidence ID anthropic:3-4 context). Another noted PostHog does not natively include email functionality in the sense of a dedicated email product ^[46].

Organizations requiring broad multichannel orchestration beyond email, SMS, and webhooks will find narrower channel breadth. One platform noted PostHog Workflows supports email and SMS but not push or WhatsApp (Evidence ID anthropic:22-10 context). Another said PostHog is primarily email, Slack, and webhooks with fewer native channels than dedicated ESPs (Evidence ID grok:4 context).

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions explored

• What is a better alternative to PostHog when a SaaS team needs mature email deliverability and journey design?
• When should a buyer choose a dedicated lifecycle platform or a separate CDP instead of PostHog?

Choose a specialized lifecycle engagement platform when the primary need is mature email journey design, extensive SaaS templates, advanced deliverability management, or high-volume sending (Evidence ID openai:c1 context). One platform named Customer.io, HubSpot, and Brevo as stronger choices when email sophistication, deliverability, or marketing-first operations are priorities (Evidence ID anthropic:42-12 context). Another named Customer.io for complex multi-branch journeys and wait steps, while noting it requires feeding data from a separate system ^[37].

Choose a separate customer data platform plus engagement tool when product events must be unified across many external systems with stringent identity resolution and governance requirements (Evidence ID openai:c8 context). One platform noted PostHog's identity resolution is confined to PostHog-captured data rather than cross-system unification ^[9].

Choose an in-app engagement platform when coordinated in-product messaging matters more than developer-centric product analytics (Evidence ID openai:c6 context). One platform recommended Userpilot when in-app onboarding elements such as checklists, interactive tours, and tooltips must pair with email triggers (Evidence ID google:cit_workflows_launch context).

Choose a dedicated transactional platform for receipts, alerts, and password resets. One platform named Resend, Mailgun, and SendGrid for that use case (Evidence ID anthropic:3-4 context). Another recommended Brevo or Twilio Segment when multimodal communications across email, SMS, WhatsApp, and push are required in one platform (Evidence ID anthropic:22-10 context).

If the team does not use PostHog for analytics and wants to avoid adopting a new analytics platform just for email automation, one platform suggested Loops, Brevo, or Customer.io with external event tracking (Evidence ID anthropic:3-4 context). Buyers comparing options across this category can review the full saas product-led lifecycle emails index, and teams evaluating adjacent tools may also want the broader marketing automation and email marketing software directory.

Questions to ask before choosing a provider

Questions explored

• What should a buyer confirm with PostHog before signing a contract for lifecycle email?
• Which PostHog limits, deliverability controls, and beta commitments need written confirmation?

The platforms converged on a similar verification list. Confirm the current paid price per workflow email or message at your expected U.S. monthly volume, since the checked public pricing page exposed the free allowance but not a clearly displayed per-message paid rate (Evidence ID openai:c10 context). Confirm whether your required onboarding and churn volume fits the initial sending tier and what the process and timing are for tier increases ^[18].

Confirm sending domain support and whether dedicated IPs, custom DKIM/SPF/DMARC controls, and suppression management are available (Evidence ID openai:c7 context). One platform noted setup requires verifying the sending domain by making four DNS entries directly in the interface ^[36], and that deliverability failures are logged on individual workflow invocations ^[20].

Confirm which workflow triggers are real-time and what event-processing delay or retry behavior applies (Evidence ID openai:c1 context). Confirm whether workflows can branch on the exact product events, cohorts, account properties, billing status, and inactivity windows you require (Evidence ID openai:c1 context). Confirm how identity merges, anonymous-to-known users, multiple users per account, and account-level suppression are handled (Evidence ID openai:c1 context).

Confirm the current Workflows beta or GA status, roadmap, support commitment, and backward-compatibility policy, given the conflicting dates across platforms ^[7]. Confirm what workflow, email, batch-audience, template, API, retention, and support limits apply to your selected plan (Evidence ID openai:c7 context). Confirm enterprise security, data-processing, access-control, audit-log, and regional data-residency requirements (Evidence ID openai:c1 context). Confirm whether the in-app messages, surveys, feature-flag changes, and email steps you need are available in one coordinated journey (Evidence ID openai:c6 context).

The consensus assessment

PostHog is a good fit for SaaS product-led lifecycle emails when the buyer is an engineering-led team already using PostHog for product analytics and wants onboarding, activation, and churn-prevention emails triggered directly from in-product behavior. Six of seven platforms rated the fit good and one rated it strong. The consensus strengths are native product-event triggering with no separate marketing dataset, developer-friendly instrumentation, and a unified analytics-plus-automation stack on usage-based pricing with a 10,000-message monthly free allowance.

The consensus limitations are equally clear. Workflows is newer than dedicated lifecycle platforms, the email builder is described as basic by independent reviewers, sending is constrained by reputation-based tiers starting at 50 emails per hour, and no platform established a comprehensive turnkey template library. Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date of 2026-10-02, with one platform reporting 2026-01-15. Most supporting citations are company-owned PostHog documentation, and no platform supplied independent deliverability testing or lifecycle conversion benchmarks. Buyers should verify per-message pricing, sending tiers, deliverability controls, template availability, and current Workflows maturity directly with PostHog before committing.

How This Review Was Produced

This review evaluated PostHog only for the saas product-led lifecycle emails use case, not as a general company assessment. Seven AI platforms were asked which providers they would recommend for a SaaS company needing onboarding, activation, upgrade, and churn-prevention emails based on in-product behavior rather than form-fill data. Two of the seven platforms named PostHog during ranking discovery, with an average listed rank of 1.5 and a best rank of 1. All seven platforms then produced fit research covering product usage data integration, behavioral trigger sophistication, trial and churn lifecycle templates, developer-friendly event tracking, and in-app messaging pairing. Findings were synthesized from those platform responses and their cited sources. The research date is 2026-10-02.

Research limitations

Platform mentions count only platforms that named PostHog during ranking discovery, not all platforms that evaluated fit. Two of seven platforms named it, so inclusion rests on a minority of responses.

Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations in the supplied evidence. PostHog's own documentation and pricing pages support most capability and pricing claims, and those claims should not be described as independently verified. Independent sources in the set are reviews and comparisons, not controlled testing.

Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. One platform reported 2026-01-15 while the run date is 2026-10-02. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

The deterministic identity audit flagged that official-site retrieval failed for one or more mentions and that identity was established via exact-name fallback, leaving the reported domain unverified. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.

Platforms disagreed on Workflows maturity dates and on template availability. These conflicts are described rather than resolved. No platform supplied independent deliverability testing, inbox placement rates, or lifecycle conversion benchmarks, so claims about sending quality rest on descriptions of maturity rather than measurement. Exact workflow email unit pricing was not consistently exposed across checked pages, and contract terms for enterprise arrangements were not clearly published in the retrieved sources.

See the broader SaaS Companies Needing Product-Led Lifecycle Emails consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

1. Onboarding Team - Handbook - PostHog: https://archive.posthog.com/handbook/onboarding/onboarding-team
2. PostHog: Product analytics, session replay, feature flags, experiments: https://posthog.com/
3. How we built our onboarding email flow (with actual performance data: https://posthog.com/blog/how-we-built-email-onboarding
4. PostHog Workflows Blog Tag: https://posthog.com/blog/tags/workflows
5. Workflows graduate to beta! Product data, meet automation: https://posthog.com/blog/workflows-beta
6. You product data just got a job: Workflows is now out: https://posthog.com/blog/workflows-ga
7. Changelog and workflow examples - PostHog: https://posthog.com/changelog?id=2661
8. The best email automation tools for developers, compared: https://posthog.com/compare/best-email-automation-tools-for-developers
9. PostHog Docs: https://posthog.com/docs
10. Pre-paid plans - Docs - PostHog: https://posthog.com/docs/billing/pre-paid-plans
11. Next steps - PostHog: https://posthog.com/docs/getting-started/next-steps
12. Send events - Docs: https://posthog.com/docs/getting-started/send-events
13. PostHog documentation: SDKs and event capture: https://posthog.com/docs/libraries
14. Next.js - Docs: https://posthog.com/docs/libraries/next-js
15. Workflows - Docs - PostHog: https://posthog.com/docs/workflows
16. Send a broadcast - Docs - PostHog: https://posthog.com/docs/workflows/broadcasts
17. Create emails with PostHog AI - Docs: https://posthog.com/docs/workflows/create-emails-ai
18. Sending reputation and allowance - Docs - PostHog: https://posthog.com/docs/workflows/sending-reputation
19. Getting started with workflows - Docs - PostHog: https://posthog.com/docs/workflows/start-here
20. Workflows troubleshooting - Docs - PostHog: https://posthog.com/docs/workflows/troubleshooting
21. Workflow builder - Docs - PostHog: https://posthog.com/docs/workflows/workflow-builder
22. Growth & Marketing - Handbook: https://posthog.com/handbook/growth/use-case-selling/growth-and-marketing
23. Email comms - Handbook: https://posthog.com/handbook/marketing/email-comms
24. Onboarding and lifecycle emails - Handbook: https://posthog.com/handbook/marketing/onboarding-and-lifecycle-emails
25. Onboarding conversations playbook - Handbook: https://posthog.com/handbook/onboarding/onboarding-conversations-playbook
26. Onboarding - Handbook - PostHog: https://posthog.com/handbook/people/onboarding
27. PostHog pricing – Start free, scale when you need: https://posthog.com/pricing
28. Hire a PostHog expert - PostHog Services: https://posthog.com/services
29. Onboarding started but not completed workflow template - PostHog: https://posthog.com/templates/workflow/onboarding-started-but-not-completed
30. A complete guide to Workflows: Emails, i18n, push notifications, webhooks, and more: https://posthog.com/tutorials/complete-workflows-guide
31. PostHog Workflows Official Product Page: https://posthog.com/workflows
32. Workflows Pricing: https://posthog.com/workflows/pricing

Independent Sources

33. PostHog for SaaS: A Practical Guide to Product Analytics and Event Tracking: https://bix-tech.com/posthog-for-saas-a-practical-guide-to-product-analytics-and-event-tracking/
34. What Is Braze? Features, Pricing & Alternatives: https://cdp.com/articles/what-is-braze/
35. PostHog Pricing 2026: Plans, Costs & Volume Discounts - PostHog: https://checkthat.ai/brands/posthog/pricing
36. PostHog Workflows Tutorial: i18n, Push Notifications & Webhooks - DEV Community: https://dev.to/b42/posthog-workflows-tutorial-i18n-push-notifications-webhooks-314h
37. PostHog vs Customer.io: which behavioral email setup fits your SaaS? - GetFluxly: https://getfluxly.com/blog/posthog-vs-customer-io
38. PostHog Pricing 2026: Free Tier, Rates and Worked Examples: https://rybbit.com/blog/posthog-pricing
39. PostHog Pricing: How Much Does PostHog Cost in 2026?: https://schematichq.com/blog/posthog-pricing
40. PostHog Analytics 2026: Deep-Dive Review + Alternatives: https://userpilot.com/blog/posthog-analytics/
41. PostHog Features in 2026: What's Free vs. Cloud-Only: https://userpilot.com/blog/posthog-features/
42. How to use PostHog workflows: triggers, emails & testing explained: https://visionlabs.com/academy/posthog/workflows/
43. How to use PostHog workflows: triggers, emails & testing explained | Vision Labs: https://visionlabs.com/blog/how-to-use-posthog-workflows
44. PostHog and lifecycle email: what it covers and what to pair it with: https://www.getfluxly.com/blog/posthog-email-automation
45. PostHog alternative for lifecycle email (2026) · GetFluxly: https://www.getfluxly.com/vs/posthog
46. 21 Best Email Tools With PostHog Integration (2026: https://www.sequenzy.com/blog/best-email-tools-with-posthog-integration
47. How to Use PostHog Workflows to Understand Why Users Behave the Way They Do: https://www.usercall.co/post/posthog-workflows-understand-user-behavior
48. How to Use PostHog Workflows: Triggers, Emails & Testing Explained - YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIZoHPGocDU