Independent research. A clearer software perspective.
Business SoftwareConsensus Index

PROVIDER FIT REVIEWMarketing Automation & Email Marketing Software

Klaviyo Review: Enterprise Multichannel Marketing

Klaviyo is a good but not unqualified fit for enterprise multi-channel marketing automation. Learn its scale, governance gaps, and pricing before you buy.

STUDY SNAPSHOTRecorded recommendations · not product testing
Research date
October 1, 2026
Usable AI responses
7
Consensus position
#5
Source URLs in evidence
57

RECOMMENDATION COVERAGE

Klaviyo

Recommended by 3 of 7 AI platforms in this study.

42.9%Consensus coverage · not a customer rating

The research in brief

Klaviyo is a good, but not unqualified, fit for enterprise multi-channel marketing automation. Three of seven platforms named Klaviyo during the ranking stage (DeepSeek, Gemini, Perplexity), giving it a 42.9% share of included platform responses, an average listed rank of 6.67, and a best listed rank of 5. Its strongest reason to consider it is documented scale plus broad B2C omnichannel execution on unified customer data, with multi-brand identity linking and Enterprise support/services. The main limitation is that enterprise pricing, contract terms, governance depth, and warehouse-sync readiness are not publicly transparent, and independent reviewers describe multi-brand governance as immature relative to heavier enterprise suites.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (DeepSeek, Gemini, Perplexity)
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank6.67
Best listed rank5
Software offeringKlaviyo Enterprise, including Klaviyo Marketing, Advanced Klaviyo Data Platform, multi-brand capabilities, and Enterprise support/services
Overall use-case fitGood (4 platforms); Mixed (3 platforms); 7 platforms analyzed
Research date2026-10-01

Why Klaviyo Qualified for This Study

Questions explored

  • Why did Klaviyo qualify for an enterprise multi-channel marketing automation comparison?
  • How many AI platforms named Klaviyo for complex multi-channel campaigns?

Klaviyo qualified because three of the seven included platforms named it during ranking discovery for a large marketing operations team that had outgrown a mid-market tool [15]. It was not a unanimous pick. Its average listed rank was 6.67, with ranks of 5 from DeepSeek, 6 from Gemini, and 9 from Perplexity, and a best listed rank of 5.

The platforms that named it pointed to the same core reasons: documented scale indicators, broad B2C channel coverage, unified customer profiles, and an Enterprise tier with support and services [19]. Klaviyo's own Enterprise page states the platform maintains more than 7.3 billion customer profiles, processes more than 2 billion average daily events and 1.6 billion average daily API calls, and reports 99.95% uptime [19]. Those are company-reported figures, not independently audited guarantees.

Fit ratings split across platforms: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok rated Klaviyo a good fit; DeepSeek, Kimi, and Perplexity rated it mixed. That split is the central finding of this review.

The software offering in focus

Questions explored

  • Which Klaviyo plan should a buyer choose for enterprise multi-channel marketing automation?
  • Is Klaviyo Enterprise the same as Klaviyo One?

The relevant offering is Klaviyo Enterprise, which platforms variously described as "Klaviyo Enterprise," "Klaviyo One," or "Klaviyo Enterprise (featuring Advanced KDP and Portfolio)" [19]. The naming is inconsistent across sources, and buyers should confirm which commercial construct applies to their contract.

The Enterprise stack combines several separately positioned components: Klaviyo Marketing for campaign execution, Advanced Klaviyo Data Platform for warehouse sync and data transformation, Portfolio for multi-account management, and Enterprise support and professional services [24]. Klaviyo's public pricing page shows separate product areas for Marketing, Data + Analytics, and Professional Services rather than a single bundled Enterprise price [24].

Channel coverage in Enterprise positioning spans email, SMS, mobile push, WhatsApp, web, social, and paid channels using shared customer data and unified profiles [19]. Independent reviewers describe the platform's center of gravity as B2C ecommerce rather than broad cross-industry enterprise orchestration [40].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions explored

  • What do AI platforms agree Klaviyo does well for enterprise multi-channel marketing automation?
  • Does Klaviyo have documented scale for millions of contacts?

The clearest agreement was on scale and channel breadth for consumer marketing. Multiple platforms cited Klaviyo's company-reported figures of 7+ billion customer profiles and 2+ billion daily events [19]. Independent coverage repeated the same scale numbers [42].

Platforms also agreed that Klaviyo supports omnichannel orchestration across email, SMS, WhatsApp, push, web, and paid channels from unified profiles [19]. Google described native reverse ETL to Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, and Databricks [16], and Perplexity listed the same warehouse connectors plus S3 and Azure [3].

There was broad agreement that Klaviyo offers Enterprise support and professional services, including dedicated account management, priority support, training, and technical and deliverability audits [31]. Klaviyo's published support comparison describes these packages; independent pricing reviews place Professional tier support from $500/month and Enterprise tier from $1,800/month [53].

Platforms also agreed that Klaviyo's multi-brand model uses separate brand accounts wrapped by Portfolio, with cross-brand identity linking at the organization level [9]. The cross-brand identity layer is described as read-only and does not itself activate campaigns [13].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions explored

  • Is Klaviyo's multi-brand governance mature enough for a large enterprise?
  • Is Klaviyo's data warehouse sync production-ready today?

The sharpest disagreement was about governance maturity. Google described Klaviyo's permissioning as an advantage, citing Custom User Roles and Portfolio-level bulk user management [8]. Kimi described multi-brand governance as "immature" and "young" in 2026 evaluations [48]. An independent review scored Klaviyo's governance and role-based controls at 4.0/5 while noting gaps in multi-account ownership recovery workflows and approval gates versus heavier enterprise suites [54]. Deepseek said multi-brand governance is not clearly documented as a first-class feature [24].

Warehouse sync readiness was also contested. Klaviyo documents native warehouse import and sync with Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Databricks, S3, and Azure [3]. But one independent source states bidirectional warehouse sync to Snowflake, BigQuery, and Databricks is rolling out in phases through Q3 2026 and not yet generally available [37]. Perplexity's help-doc review found only one data warehouse destination is supported per account [4].

Pricing transparency was a third fault line. Google reported high pricing confidence with specific figures, including a mandatory 20% surcharge above $10,000 monthly spend and Enterprise contracts spanning roughly $135,000 to over $2.8 million annually [51]. Openai, DeepSeek, and Perplexity all reported low pricing confidence and no published Enterprise price [24]. Anthropic reported moderate confidence and a 20% surcharge at the Klaviyo One threshold [51].

Channel depth drew mixed assessments. Deepseek called Klaviyo's native coverage narrower than enterprise marketing clouds [15]. Kimi said mobile app and in-app messaging lag Braze and Iterable [48]. Google said Klaviyo lags mobile-first alternatives for rich in-app features [50].

Features for this workload

Questions explored

  • Does Klaviyo support role-based permissions and audit logging for enterprise governance?
  • How does Klaviyo handle multi-brand data isolation and cross-brand identity?

Scalability to millions of contacts: Klaviyo's Enterprise page reports 7.3 billion customer profiles, 2 billion average daily events, 1.6 billion average daily API calls, and 99.95% uptime [19]. Grok reported 2.5 billion daily events and no data caps [19]. These are company-reported indicators, not buyer-specific capacity guarantees. One independent source noted Klaviyo's scale is bounded mostly by profile and sending limits rather than backend infrastructure [52].

Governance and permissioning: Klaviyo states Enterprise includes role-based access controls, audit logging, and data-residency options [19]. Google cited Custom User Roles allowing granular permission combinations and Portfolio-level bulk user management [8]. Exact role granularity, approval workflows, and audit-log retention are not fully established in the reviewed sources [19].

Data warehouse and CDP integration: Advanced Klaviyo Data Platform is positioned as a profile-based data product that can sync data to warehouses and other platforms with no-code transformations [1]. Klaviyo states it has more than 350 integrations [24]. Advanced KDP is explicitly not included in the standard marketing application and requires a separate subscription [12].

Multi-brand support: Klaviyo requires separate accounts per brand, with Portfolio providing centralized reporting, asset cloning, billing, and user access [9]. Cross-brand identity resolution links profiles across accounts for portfolio-level insight without exposing underlying brand data [13]. Portfolios are described as free to link [5].

Professional services availability: Klaviyo offers Enterprise professional support and services, including dedicated training and technical and deliverability audits [31]. Independent reviews place Professional tier support from $500/month with a 2-hour response target and Enterprise tier from $1,800/month with a 1-hour response target, 24/7 live chat, and a dedicated solutions architect [53]. Scope, fees, and eligibility for a specific US enterprise are not publicly established [31].

Pricing, renewal terms, and ongoing costs

Questions explored

  • How much does Klaviyo Enterprise cost per month, and what surcharges apply?
  • What contract terms and cancellation rules apply to Klaviyo Enterprise?

Enterprise pricing is quote-based and not publicly disclosed as a fixed price [24]. The likely commercial structure combines Klaviyo Marketing with optional Advanced Klaviyo Data Platform, analytics, service, AI, mobile messaging, and professional-services components [24].

Reported cost components, with confidence levels:

Cost elementReported figureSource confidence
Email plan at 100K profiles
~$1,380/month
Moderate [51]
Email plan at 250K profiles
~$2,300/month
Moderate [51]
Klaviyo One trigger
Automatic at $10,000/month spend
Moderate to high [51]
Klaviyo One surcharge
Mandatory 20% on total monthly spend
Moderate to high [51]
Advanced KDP
From $500/month (100K profiles) to $1,250/month (250K profiles)
Moderate [53]
Professional support
$500/month (Professional) to $1,800/month (Enterprise)
Moderate [53]
Dedicated IP
~$150/month
Moderate [53]
Full Enterprise contracts
~$135,000 to over $2.8M annually
High per Gemini only [51]

Mobile messaging is usage-based and varies by channel, region, number type, carrier, and message segments [1]. WhatsApp is billed per delivered template message [1]. RCS agent fees are currently stated as zero, but Klaviyo notes US fees may be introduced later [11]. Klaviyo states carrier fees are bundled into mobile-message rates [1].

Contract terms: Standard paid plans are documented as monthly-renewing, while manually billed contract customers must manage plan changes through their Klaviyo representative [1]. Enterprise minimum commitments, cancellation notice, renewal, price-escalation, and termination terms are not publicly established [1]. Google reported that self-serve plans are month-to-month with no annual discount, while large enterprise tiers use custom annual or multi-year agreements [51].

Best Suited For

Questions explored

  • Is Klaviyo a good choice for a large B2C brand running email, SMS, and WhatsApp at scale?
  • Which buyer profile gets the most value from Klaviyo Enterprise?

Klaviyo is best suited to large B2C, retail, ecommerce, hospitality, and consumer brands that prioritize rapid omnichannel campaign execution and real-time segmentation [19]. Multi-brand organizations that need portfolio-level insight while preserving brand-level data boundaries are also a documented fit, provided they accept separate accounts per brand wrapped by Portfolio [13].

Organizations with existing warehouse infrastructure seeking native reverse ETL to Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, or Databricks are a stated fit, subject to the warehouse-sync readiness caveat [16]. Teams willing to obtain enterprise pricing and validate governance, integration, and service terms during procurement are the realistic buyer profile [19].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions explored

  • Who should not choose Klaviyo for enterprise multi-channel marketing automation?
  • Is Klaviyo a poor fit for B2B or highly regulated enterprises?

Klaviyo is probably not the best fit for organizations requiring a single suite spanning sophisticated B2B account-based marketing, sales automation, service, and marketing operations governance [19]. Deepseek and Kimi both flagged B2B and complex considered-purchase funnels as weak alignment [15].

Highly decentralized enterprises requiring extensive parent-child approval workflows and granular operating controls beyond documented role and brand permissions should verify carefully [19]. Buyers seeking fully transparent public enterprise pricing or a standardized all-inclusive implementation package will not find one [24].

Organizations where mobile app and in-app messaging are core channels should note that independent sources describe Klaviyo's mobile capabilities as thinner than Braze [48]. Enterprises requiring isolated or on-premise deployment are also outside Klaviyo's documented model [40].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions explored

  • What is a better alternative to Klaviyo for tightly integrated CRM and enterprise workflow governance?
  • When should a buyer choose a standalone CDP instead of Klaviyo?

Choose a broader enterprise suite such as Salesforce Marketing Cloud or Adobe if the buyer needs tightly integrated CRM, sales, service, account-based marketing, or extensive enterprise workflow governance [19]. Salesforce Marketing Cloud implementations routinely cost $10,000 to $150,000+ in consulting fees, with base licensing reported at $18,000 to $39,000 annually [36].

Consider a composable CDP plus specialized campaign tools if the data warehouse must remain the primary system of record and marketing activation needs deep customization [19]. Independent sources specifically recommend evaluating dedicated CDPs if production-ready bidirectional warehouse sync is required today [37].

Consider specialized messaging or retail-marketing platforms if SMS, loyalty, in-store, or transactional messaging is the dominant requirement rather than unified B2C lifecycle orchestration [19]. For mobile-first strategies relying on in-app messaging and custom push behaviors, Braze is repeatedly named as the better fit [50].

Questions to ask before choosing a provider

Questions explored

  • What should a buyer confirm with Klaviyo before signing an Enterprise contract?
  • Which Klaviyo capabilities need written confirmation rather than marketing-page claims?

The reviewed platforms converged on a similar verification list. Buyers should confirm total annual price at their active-profile count, total-profile count, email volume, SMS volume, WhatsApp volume, and number of brands [19]. They should confirm whether Advanced KDP, analytics, AI, service, mobile channels, and premium support are included or separately contracted [24].

Contract questions matter most: Enterprise minimum commitment, renewal, price-escalation, cancellation, termination, and overage terms are not publicly established [1]. Buyers should also confirm which data warehouses and reverse-sync destinations are supported, along with latency, throughput, retention, and cost characteristics, and whether the one-warehouse-destination-per-account limit applies to their architecture [4].

Governance verification should cover whether administrators can enforce brand, region, business-unit, campaign, audience, template, and approval permissions at the required granularity, what audit logs exist, how long they are retained, and whether they can be exported to a SIEM or governance platform [19]. Buyers should also confirm documented API, event-ingestion, send-rate, concurrency, and peak-season limits, plus service-level commitments, support response targets, escalation paths, and named resources [19].

The consensus assessment

Klaviyo is a good, but not unqualified, fit for enterprise multi-channel marketing automation. Four of seven platforms rated it a good fit and three rated it mixed. It should be shortlisted when the organization is primarily B2C, consumer-data driven, and wants scalable, fast-to-operate omnichannel execution with multi-brand support [19].

It should not be selected without validating enterprise governance depth, warehouse architecture, total channel costs, professional-services scope, and contractual commitments against broader enterprise alternatives [19]. The strongest positioning is B2C CRM and consumer marketing; fit is less certain for complex B2B, account-based, or sales-led processes [19].

For buyers comparing this option against the full field, the enterprise multi-channel marketing automation consensus index aggregates the platform-level findings. Buyers who need a wider view of adjacent tools can also review the marketing automation and email marketing software category directory.

How This Review Was Produced

This review synthesizes fit-research responses from seven AI platforms: ChatGPT (gpt-5.6-luna), Claude (claude-haiku-4-5-20251001), DeepSeek (deepseek-v4-flash), Grok (x-ai/grok-4.3), Kimi (moonshotai/kimi-k2.6), Gemini (gemini-3.5-flash), and Perplexity (perplexity/sonar). Each platform was asked which providers it would recommend for a large organization with a dedicated marketing operations department that had outgrown a mid-market tool and needed governance, scale, warehouse or CDP integration, and professional services.

Three of seven platforms named Klaviyo during ranking discovery. All seven produced fit assessments. Platform-reported research dates were 2026-10-01 for six platforms and 2026-01-15 for DeepSeek. The authoritative run research date is 2026-10-01.

Research limitations

Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date; DeepSeek's assessment is dated 2026-01-15 and may not reflect later changes. Platform mentions count only platforms that named Klaviyo during ranking discovery, not all platforms that evaluated fit.

Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations in the supplied evidence, so company claims about scale, uptime, certifications, and comparative positioning should not be described as independently verified. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Deepseek's response was produced without search enabled, so its claims require explicit verification before being treated as current.

The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated. The supplied official website is the UK site while this assessment targets the United States; regional pricing, messaging availability, compliance, and contract terms may differ. Public pricing pages do not disclose a complete Enterprise price card or standard contract template. The reviewed sources do not fully specify data-warehouse connector coverage, API quotas, event-ingestion SLAs, cross-account activation limitations, or administrative role granularity.

See the broader Complex Multi-Channel Campaigns consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  1. How to create a custom user role | Klaviyo Help Center: https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/12316315570075
  2. Getting started with Advanced KDP | Klaviyo Help Center: https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/17655007276059
  3. Understand data warehouse syncing in Klaviyo: https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/17759932376475
  4. Getting started with portfolios | Klaviyo Help Center: https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/21983584850715
  5. How to manage users in bulk across a portfolio | Klaviyo Help Center: https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/21984242699803
  6. Understanding data warehouse import in Klaviyo: https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/23971488667547
  7. Understanding user roles for organizations | Klaviyo Help Center: https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/27885440788635
  8. How to create and manage multiple accounts: https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002165611
  9. Understanding data warehouse import in Klaviyo: https://help.klaviyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/40939206649627
  10. Klaviyo - Platform / Product: https://www.klaviyo.com/
  11. Introducing data warehouse import: reverse ETL made simple: https://www.klaviyo.com/blog/introducing-data-warehouse-import-reverse-etl-made-simple
  12. Klaviyo data warehouse import: reverse ETL made simple: https://www.klaviyo.com/blog/introducing-reverse-etl
  13. Meet Klaviyo Portfolio: Our New Feature For Multi-Account Management: https://www.klaviyo.com/blog/meet-klaviyo-portfolio-our-new-feature-for-multi-account-management
  14. The Enterprise Marketing Platform for Marketing Automation: https://www.klaviyo.com/enterprise
  15. Enterprise Marketing Automation for Ecommerce Brands - Klaviyo: https://www.klaviyo.com/enterprise/marketing-automation
  16. Klaviyo Multi-Account Management: Portfolio Management - Klaviyo: https://www.klaviyo.com/features/portfolio
  17. Klaviyo Integrations / Data Platform: https://www.klaviyo.com/integrations
  18. Klaviyo Partner Directory: https://www.klaviyo.com/partners
  19. The Enterprise Customer Data Platform (CDP) - Klaviyo: https://www.klaviyo.com/products/advanced-cdp
  20. Advanced Klaviyo Data Platform: The Enterprise CDP - Klaviyo: https://www.klaviyo.com/sg/products/advanced-cdp
  21. The Better Customer Data Platform (CDP Solution) - Klaviyo: https://www.klaviyo.com/solutions/customer-data-platform
  22. The Marketing Automation Platform for Email, SMS, & WhatsApp - Klaviyo: https://www.klaviyo.com/solutions/marketing-automation
  23. Enterprise Marketing Automation: A 2026 Guide: https://www.klaviyo.com/solutions/marketing-automation/enterprise
  24. Omnichannel marketing automation: How to Power Every Channel With AI - Klaviyo: https://www.klaviyo.com/solutions/omnichannel/automation
  25. Klaviyo Premium Support and Customer Success Packages: https://www.klaviyo.com/success/premium-support
  26. Enterprise Marketing Automation: A 2026 Guide - Klaviyo UK: https://www.klaviyo.com/uk/solutions/ai/customer-agent/enterprise-marketing-automation
  27. Official pricing and terms source: https://www.klaviyo.com/uk/
  28. Official pricing and terms source: https://www.klaviyo.com/uk/pricing

Independent Sources

  1. Amperity vs Klaviyo CDP: Features, Pricing & Fit: https://amperity.com/compare/amperity-vs-klaviyo-cdp
  2. Salesforce Marketing Cloud Review 2026: Agentforce & AI-Native Enterprise Marketing: https://bizmailnet.com/salesforce-marketing-cloud-review/
  3. Is Klaviyo a CDP? Features, Pricing & Alternatives: https://cdp.com/articles/what-is-klaviyo/
  4. Is Klaviyo a CDP? Features, Pricing & Alternatives: https://cdp.com/klaviyo/
  5. Klaviyo | The AI-First Growth Platform for B2C Brands: https://discovermybusiness.co/klaviyo-marketing-automation/
  6. HubSpot Klaviyo Integration | eCommerce Sync: https://integrateiq.com/hubspot-klaviyo-integration/
  7. Klaviyo turns AI and data loose on the challenges of multichannel marketing: https://martech.org/klaviyo-turns-ai-and-data-loose-on-the-challenges-of-multichannel-marketing/
  8. Salesforce Marketing Cloud Review: $1,500+: https://martechsignal.com/tools/salesforce-marketing-cloud/
  9. Klaviyo vs. Sendlane: Which Email Marketing Tool is Best for You?: https://onehourprofessor.com/klaviyo-vs-sendlane/
  10. Klaviyo Review (2026): Pricing, Real Cost at Scale & Verdict: https://realcostlabs.com/reviews/klaviyo/
  11. Multi-Channel Marketing Automation: What Demos Won't Show: https://themarketingjuice.com/multi-channel-marketing-automation-software-comparison/
  12. Klaviyo Pricing 2026: Find the Best Plan for your Ecommerce Store: https://www.emailtooltester.com/en/reviews/klaviyo/pricing/
  13. Braze vs Klaviyo: Enterprise Messaging vs Ecommerce Email: https://www.nudgify.com/blog/braze-vs-klaviyo/
  14. Klaviyo Pricing in 2026: Every Plan, Cost, and Hidden Fee Explained: https://www.omnisend.com/blog/klaviyo-pricing/
  15. Klaviyo Pricing 2026: Every Plan, Every Tier and What You Actually Pay: https://www.retainful.com/blog/klaviyo-pricing
  16. Klaviyo · Product Maturity: Roadmap & Momentum (2026: https://www.rfp.wiki/marketing/multichannel-marketing-hubs/klaviyo
  17. Klaviyo enterprise pricing: what Klaviyo One really costs: https://www.ringly.io/blog/klaviyo-enterprise-pricing
  18. Salesforce vs. Braze vs. Klaviyo: Comparing Marketing Automation Tools: https://www.salesforce.com/blog/marketing-automation-comparison/
  19. Marketing Cloud Engagement: The Tool For Scaling Mid-Market & Enterprise Brands: https://www.superstoke.io/post/marketing-cloud-engagement-the-tool-for-scaling-mid-market-enterprise-brands

TRANSPARENCY BY DESIGN

The evidence behind this study

Research is a dated snapshot of AI recommendations and their supporting sources. Use the original evidence and methodology to understand what these findings can and cannot tell you.

Independent source records
23
Provider-owned source records
34
Direct support records
30

AI platforms in the study

ChatGPTClaudeDeepSeekGrokPerplexityKimiGemini

Study limitations

  • The study date identifies this research snapshot; dates reported by AI platforms do not independently establish source freshness.
  • Recommendation counts measure mentions during the ranking stage. Later fit assessments do not increase those counts.
  • Product names, costs, and features can differ across sources. Confirm conflicting details directly with the provider.
  • Source URLs came from AI platform responses and were not independently validated during report preparation.
  • Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations; do not describe company claims as independently verified.
  • Some dates reported by AI platforms differ from the study date. Those dates do not independently establish that the information is current.

Affiliate & commercial disclosure

We may receive compensation when you follow certain links, subscribe to a software plan, or take another qualifying action through a commercial partner. These relationships create a potential financial conflict, but do not influence recorded AI recommendations or ranking calculations. Partner availability, pricing, features, and service terms can vary.

Read the full Affiliate Disclosure for compensation, tracking, partner availability, and research independence details, or contact us with a disclosure question.

Verify the source snapshot

SHA-256: 1d4c21289bdb2a5c2db56e42b8a5ab82c89e6d74806b98d17e6a40d9297fc919