Amazon SES Review: Transactional Email APIs

The research in brief

Amazon SES is a good fit for developer transactional email API use cases, and five of the six included platforms named it during ranking discovery (83% of included platform responses). Its strongest advantage is cost: listed Essentials rates run $0.16 per 1,000 emails for the first 10 million monthly emails, falling to $0.11 above 100 million, with no upfront commitments ^[4]. The main limitation is operational: production access, identity verification, bounce and complaint handling, event pipelines, and reputation management are buyer responsibilities, and AWS publishes no guaranteed inbox-placement rate in the cited sources ^[14].

Research Snapshot

Why Amazon SES Qualified for This Study

Questions explored

• Why did Amazon SES qualify as a transactional email API for developer application emails?
• Is Amazon SES widely recommended by AI platforms for sending password resets and receipts?

Amazon SES qualified because it is explicitly positioned for application-triggered email and was named by five of the six included platforms during ranking discovery. It appeared in the ranking stage on DeepSeek, Gemini, Kimi, ChatGPT, and Perplexity, with listed ranks between 3 and 5 and an average listed rank of 4.2. It did not appear in the ranking-stage list for Claude, which is why the mention count is 5 rather than 6.

The service matches the study's core criteria directly. It offers both an HTTPS API and an SMTP interface for sending transactional mail ^[6], publishes API reference and developer-guide documentation on docs.aws.amazon.com ^[6], supports event publishing to AWS destinations for delivery, bounce, and complaint signals ^[7], and prices on a pay-as-you-go basis with no minimum fees or upfront commitments stated on the reviewed pricing pages ^[2].

All six included platforms evaluated fit for this use case, but platform_mentions counts only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery. The ranking-stage evidence is platform-reported and was not independently verified.

The software offering in focus

Questions explored

• Which Amazon SES plan should a buyer choose for developer transactional email API sending?
• Does Amazon SES Essentials include both API and SMTP sending for application emails?

The relevant configuration is the Amazon SES Essentials pricing plan using the SES API v2 or the SMTP interface, with SES configuration sets and AWS event destinations added when event tracking is required. Five of the six platforms described the relevant product this way, and Grok additionally referenced pay-as-you-go and à-la-carte options ^[4].

AWS states that new SES accounts start on the Essentials plan and can later move to Pro, Enterprise, or à-la-carte pricing ^[1]. Google's response reported that new accounts default to Essentials at $0.16 per 1,000 emails and that a lower à-la-carte rate of $0.10 per 1,000 emails is available but requires opting out of the default plan ^[37]. That opt-out detail is platform-reported and should be confirmed with AWS before purchase.

Sending works through either interface. SES exposes an HTTPS API with AWS SDK support and an SMTP interface with SMTP credentials tied to IAM users ^[6]. SES v2 API and SMTP accept messages up to 40 MB, though messages over 10 MB may be throttled ^[3].

For teams comparing this configuration against other providers in the same category, the developer transactional email api consensus index collects the full ranking set.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions explored

• What do AI platforms agree Amazon SES does well for developer transactional email API?
• Is Amazon SES cheaper than managed transactional email providers at high volume?

Agreement was strongest on four points: low per-email cost, dual API and SMTP access, AWS-native event publishing, and pay-as-you-go terms without minimum commitments.

On cost, the platforms converged on the same tier structure. The Essentials plan is listed at $0.16 per 1,000 emails for 0–10 million emails per month, $0.14 per 1,000 for 10–100 million, and $0.11 per 1,000 above 100 million ^[4]. Grok reported an à-la-carte rate of $0.10 per 1,000 outbound emails alongside the Essentials tiers ^[4]. Google's response compared SES against SaaS alternatives and reported roughly $100 per million emails versus $600–$1,200 or more on competing platforms ^[35]. Kimi's response cited a third-party comparison showing raw SES at about $100 for 1 million emails versus Resend at $650 and Postmark at $1,206 ^[27]. Those competitor figures come from a vendor-owned comparison page and are platform-reported, not independently benchmarked.

On interfaces, the platforms agreed SES supports both an API and an SMTP relay from the same provider, which matters for applications that mix SDK calls with legacy SMTP senders ^[6].

On events, the platforms agreed SES publishes sending, delivery, bounce, complaint, reject, open, click, and delivery-delay event types through configuration sets and destinations including Amazon SNS, CloudWatch, Kinesis Data Firehose, EventBridge, and Pinpoint ^[7]. Multiple platforms noted this is AWS event plumbing rather than a single standalone webhook endpoint, and that configuration sets must be attached to sent messages for events to publish ^[16].

On terms, AWS describes SES as pay-as-you-go with no contract negotiations and no upfront commitments, and the reviewed pricing pages state no minimum fees or mandatory usage commitments ^[4].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions explored

• Does Amazon SES guarantee transactional email deliverability rates?
• How long does Amazon SES production access take, and do platforms agree on the timeline?

The platforms disagreed on overall fit strength and were uncertain on several operational specifics.

Fit ratings split. Grok and Kimi rated SES a strong fit; ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Perplexity, and Gemini rated it good (fit_ratings_by_platform). The split tracks how each platform weighed cost against operational burden rather than any disagreement about the product itself.

Deliverability guarantees are absent across the board. No cited source provides an independent comparative deliverability benchmark or a guaranteed inbox-placement rate (ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Perplexity). Kimi's response stated that AWS does not publish a guaranteed deliverability rate and that deliverability should be treated as configuration- and reputation-dependent rather than contractually assured ^[20]. One vendor page in the Kimi evidence set advertises "99% deliverability" for a competing product, which is a marketing claim from that vendor, not a benchmark ^[30].

Production-access timing is inconsistent. Kimi's response reported a typical 12–24 hour approval window ^[27]. OpenAI's response documented the sandbox limits - verified recipients only, 200 messages per 24 hours, 1 message per second - but did not commit to an approval timeline ^[21]. Deepseek's response explicitly noted that sandbox quota limits and production-access criteria were not summarized with a verified 2026 value in its reviewed material (DeepSeek). Buyers should treat the timeline as unverified.

Pricing details conflict. Grok reported an à-la-carte rate of $0.10 per 1,000 emails ^[4], while ChatGPT's cited pricing page lists Essentials tiers starting at $0.16 ^[4]. Google's response reported both rates and attributed the difference to a default-plan opt-out ^[37]. Perplexity's response listed example rates of $0.16, $0.22, and $0.23 per 1,000 emails depending on plan and volume (Perplexity). Dedicated IP pricing also conflicts: Grok cited $24.95 per month standard ^[4], Gemini cited $24.95 per month standard and $15 per month plus usage for managed IPs ^[37], and Kimi flagged $24.95 as unverified general knowledge rather than a cited figure (Kimi). These conflicts are unresolved in the supplied evidence.

Idempotency is unclear. Kimi's response noted that Brevo advertises UUID-based idempotency with a 30-minute TTL as a differentiator, implying raw SES lacks built-in idempotency, but this was not confirmed in AWS documentation ^[29].

Features for this workload

Questions explored

• Does Amazon SES support webhooks for bounce, complaint, and delivery events in application email workflows?
• What message size and quota limits apply to Amazon SES transactional sending?

SES covers the core developer transactional email API requirements, with the main caveat that event handling is AWS-native rather than a single webhook product.

API reliability and documentation. SES provides documented API v2 operations, AWS SDK integration, regional API endpoints, and SMTP endpoints ^[18]. Sending quotas are regional and account-specific; calls exceeding daily or per-second limits are rejected or throttled, so applications must implement retry and rate-control behavior ^[12]. Grok's response described SDK support across 10+ languages and official documentation covering SendEmail, configuration sets, and event publishing ^[22].

Transactional sending. SES supports sending messages and templated email through API and SMTP interfaces, with SES v2 supporting messages up to 40 MB including attachments ^[18]. Sending requires verified identities, and verification status applies separately by AWS Region ^[19].

Webhook and event support. SES supports sending, delivery, bounce, complaint, reject, open, click, and delivery-delay event types through configuration sets and destinations including SNS, CloudWatch, Kinesis Data Firehose, EventBridge, and Pinpoint ^[7]. These are AWS event integrations rather than a standalone webhook endpoint, and configuration sets must be applied to sent messages for event publishing to work ^[16]. The cited documentation does not establish guaranteed event-delivery latency or an end-to-end webhook service-level objective (ChatGPT).

SMTP relay options. SES provides regional SMTP endpoints and SMTP credentials in addition to API sending, and both paths remain subject to the account's regional sending quotas and throttling behavior ^[19]. Grok's response noted support for ports 465, 587, and 25 with EC2 restrictions ^[3]; Kimi's evidence cited ports 587 and 2525 ^[27]. These port details come from different sources and should be verified against current AWS documentation.

Deliverability operations. SES provides bounce and complaint notifications, suppression-list functionality, identity verification, DKIM-related setup, and sending quotas intended to control sender reputation ^[14]. AWS documents reputation thresholds that can pause sending if bounce or complaint rates are exceeded ^[20]. No cited AWS source guarantees inbox placement or a specific transactional deliverability percentage (ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Perplexity).

Production readiness. New SES accounts start in a Region-specific sandbox limited to verified recipients, 200 messages per 24 hours, and 1 message per second ^[21]. Production access and higher quotas require AWS approval or quota requests, and limits can differ across Regions ^[19].

Pricing, renewal terms, and ongoing costs

Questions explored

• How much does Amazon SES cost per 1,000 emails, and are there setup or cancellation fees?
• What extra AWS charges can increase the total cost of Amazon SES for transactional email?

SES pricing is usage-based with no stated minimum fees or upfront commitments, but related AWS services can add charges that are not included in the per-email rate.

SES outbound pricing is based on recipients, and AWS states that additional monthly fees may apply for other AWS services used with SES ^[4]. Platforms identified SNS, CloudWatch, EventBridge, Kinesis Data Firehose, and data transfer as potential additional charges ^[4]. Google's response also listed AWS Support starting at $29 per month for technical human support ^[37].

On contract terms, AWS describes SES as having no contract negotiations and no upfront commitments, and the reviewed pricing pages state no minimum fees or mandatory usage commitments ^[4]. The cited sources do not specify a separate minimum volume, cancellation notice, or termination fee for Essentials (ChatGPT). Production access is gated by an AWS request and approval process rather than a paid plan (DeepSeek).

Pricing confidence varies by platform: Grok and Gemini reported high confidence, while ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Perplexity, and Kimi reported moderate confidence. AWS pricing can vary by service configuration, Region, data transfer, and related AWS services, so the listed rates should be rechecked before purchase (ChatGPT).

Best Suited For

Questions explored

• Who gets the most value from Amazon SES for developer transactional email API?
• Is Amazon SES a good fit for AWS-native engineering teams sending high-volume application emails?

SES fits engineering teams that want low usage-based cost, a programmable API, SMTP compatibility, and integration with AWS monitoring and event services (ChatGPT, Perplexity).

The platforms converged on four buyer profiles. First, AWS-native applications already using IAM, SNS, CloudWatch, EventBridge, Firehose, or other AWS services (ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Grok, Gemini). Second, teams prioritizing low per-email cost and accepting responsibility for sender reputation and email operations (ChatGPT, Kimi). Third, applications needing both HTTPS API and SMTP relay options from one provider (ChatGPT, DeepSeek). Fourth, high-volume transactional sending where regional quotas and infrastructure can be managed (ChatGPT, Kimi).

Kimi's response framed the volume threshold more specifically, suggesting SES is strongest at 100K+ emails per month where per-email cost dominates total cost, and that teams under roughly 100K emails per month may find managed providers reduce total cost of ownership despite higher per-email rates (Kimi). That threshold is a platform opinion, not a measured benchmark.

For teams evaluating the broader category before committing, the marketing automation and email marketing software directory lists related platforms and comparison reports.

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions explored

• Who should not choose Amazon SES for developer transactional email API?
• Is Amazon SES a poor fit for teams that need turnkey templates and deliverability dashboards?

SES is not the strongest choice for buyers seeking a turnkey transactional email product with minimal deliverability and event-pipeline operations (ChatGPT, Perplexity).

The platforms identified several exclusion profiles. Teams wanting turnkey templates, dashboards, support, deliverability consulting, and webhook workflows with minimal AWS configuration (ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Grok, Gemini). Teams needing a simple non-AWS operational model or a single global account-level sending configuration (ChatGPT). Projects that cannot tolerate an initial sandbox-to-production approval step (ChatGPT, Kimi). Buyers without engineering capacity to manage IAM, domain verification, and reputation monitoring (DeepSeek). Organizations requiring contractual deliverability SLAs or hands-on onboarding for transactional email (DeepSeek). Non-technical users or rapid prototyping without developer resources (Grok). Teams needing built-in template versioning, A/B testing, or a visual email builder (Kimi).

Kimi's response also flagged that raw SES has no native template editor, campaign tools, or stored contact lists, and that senders must manage templates through the API or external systems ^[27]. That source is a vendor page describing SES limitations, so the claim is platform-reported rather than independently verified.

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions explored

• What is a better alternative to Amazon SES for a buyer who needs managed deliverability tooling?
• When does a specialized transactional email provider beat Amazon SES on total cost of ownership?

Another option may be better when the buyer values turnkey deliverability tooling, simpler webhooks, richer email-product dashboards, or vendor-managed email operations over lowest unit cost (ChatGPT).

The platforms named several alternatives by scenario. For managed transactional email with templates and lifecycle features, DeepSeek named SendGrid, Mailgun, and Postmark (DeepSeek). For simpler onboarding or managed deliverability without the AWS console, Kimi named SendGrid, Postmark, and Resend (Kimi). For teams wanting ready-to-go analytics, intuitive template editors, and out-of-the-box logs, Gemini named Postmark and Resend (Gemini). For teams under roughly 100K emails per month, Kimi suggested higher-level providers such as Brevo or SES-based wrappers like sendvia may reduce total cost of ownership despite higher per-email rates (Kimi).

Two structural alternatives appeared in the evidence. First, SES-based wrappers: Kimi's evidence described third-party services built on SES infrastructure that add dashboards and template management on top of the same sending backend ^[27]. Second, AWS add-ons: Gemini's response noted Virtual Deliverability Manager as an SES add-on for deliverability insights and recommendations ^[37].

Buyers should also weigh whether the team lacks AWS operational expertise or cannot accommodate Region-specific identity verification and production-access processes, in which case a specialized provider is the more direct path (ChatGPT).

Questions to ask before choosing a provider

The platforms supplied overlapping verification lists. The consolidated items below combine them; each is platform-reported and should be confirmed with AWS before purchase.

• Which AWS Region or Regions will send the application's email, and what production daily and per-second quotas will AWS approve? (ChatGPT, DeepSeek)
• How long will production-access approval and quota increases take for this application's sending profile? (ChatGPT, Kimi)
• Are SPF, DKIM, DMARC, custom MAIL FROM, and bounce/complaint handling configured for every sending Region? (ChatGPT, DeepSeek)
• Which events are required, and will the team use SNS, EventBridge, CloudWatch, Firehose, or another destination? (ChatGPT, Perplexity)
• Will the application attach the required SES configuration set to every send so events are captured? (ChatGPT)
• What are the estimated monthly costs for SES plus SNS, CloudWatch, EventBridge, Firehose, data transfer, and other AWS dependencies? (ChatGPT, Perplexity)
• What retry, idempotency, throttling, and dead-letter handling will be implemented for API errors and event processing? (ChatGPT, Kimi)
• Which SES pricing path applies to the account now: Essentials, Pro, Enterprise, or à-la-carte? (Perplexity, Gemini)
• Are dedicated IPs required for the projected volume, and what is their current cost and warm-up guidance? (DeepSeek, Grok)
• Does the application's IAM and credential model (SMTP credentials versus SigV4/SDK) meet the team's security requirements? (DeepSeek)
• What deliverability monitoring and suppression workflow will be owned by the engineering or operations team? (ChatGPT, DeepSeek)
• Are the current Essentials prices, volume tiers, and any account-specific discounts still applicable on the purchase date? (ChatGPT)

The consensus assessment

Amazon SES is a good fit for developer transactional email API use cases, with a split verdict on strength. Four of the six included platforms rated it good and two rated it strong. It was named in the ranking stage by five of six platforms, at an average listed rank of 4.2 and a best listed rank of 3.

The case for SES rests on cost and control: listed Essentials rates of $0.16 per 1,000 emails falling to $0.11 at high volume, dual API and SMTP interfaces, AWS-native event publishing, and pay-as-you-go terms with no stated minimum commitments ^[4]. The case against rests on operations: sandbox-to-production gating, Region-specific identity verification, buyer-owned bounce and complaint handling, event pipelines that require AWS configuration, and no cited guarantee of inbox placement ^[21].

Buyers should confirm production quotas, regional setup, related AWS charges, and internal ownership of reputation management before purchase. AI-platform agreement on these points does not prove product quality; it reflects what the included platforms reported from the sources they cited, most of which are AWS-owned documentation and pricing pages.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from a fixed research run dated 2026-10-02 covering six included AI platforms: DeepSeek, Gemini, Grok, Kimi, ChatGPT, and Perplexity. Each platform was asked which providers it would recommend for a software team sending automated, application-triggered emails such as password resets, order confirmations, and system alerts, with attention to API documentation, transactional deliverability, webhook support, SMTP relay options, and predictable pricing as volume scales.

Amazon SES was named in the ranking stage by five of the six platforms. All six platforms supplied fit-research responses that were used in this review. Fit ratings, pricing figures, feature descriptions, and verification questions were extracted from those responses and their cited sources. No personal testing, customer interviews, or independent benchmark runs were performed.

Research limitations

Several limitations apply to this review.

Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. Deepseek's response is dated 2026-06-09; the other five platforms are dated 2026-10-02. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations. Of the deduplicated citation set, 33 are company-owned and 5 are independent. AWS documentation and pricing pages dominate the evidence base, so company claims should not be described as independently verified.

Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.

Deepseek's response was produced without search enabled, so its claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts.

Conflicting product names, pricing, and capabilities were not resolved by guessing. Where platforms disagreed - on à-la-carte versus Essentials rates, dedicated IP pricing, production-access timing, and idempotency support - the conflict is described above and buyers are directed to verify.

The supplied official website URL is an AWS SES control-page URL rather than the principal SES documentation or pricing URL, so entity identity is supported mainly by the AWS pricing and documentation sources cited below.

No cited source provides an independent comparative deliverability benchmark, a guaranteed inbox-placement rate, or an end-to-end webhook service-level objective. Production sending quotas are account- and Region-specific, so a buyer's actual approved limits cannot be inferred from public default documentation.

See the broader Developers Sending Application Emails consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

1. Introducing Amazon Simple Email Service (SES) pricing plans | Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/messaging-and-targeting/introducing-amazon-simple-email-service-ses-pricing-plans/
2. Cloud Email Sending Service - Amazon Simple Email Service - AWS: https://aws.amazon.com/ses/
3. Amazon Simple Email Service FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/ses/faqs/
4. Amazon SES pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/ses/pricing/
5. Email API for Developers - Bavimail: https://bavimail.com/for/developers
6. Amazon Simple Email Service Documentation: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/
7. EventDestination: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/APIReference-V2/API_EventDestination.html
8. Amazon SES event destinations: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/event-destinations.html
9. Set up an Amazon SNS event destination for event publishing: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/event-publishing-add-event-destination-sns.html
10. Step 2: Add an event destination - Amazon Simple Email Service: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/event-publishing-add-event-destination.html
11. Interpreting Amazon SES event data from Amazon SNS: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/event-publishing-retrieving-sns.html
12. Errors related to the sending quotas for your Amazon SES account: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/manage-sending-quotas-errors.html
13. Managing your Amazon SES sending limits: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/manage-sending-quotas.html
14. Setting up event notifications for Amazon SES: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/monitor-sending-activity-using-notifications.html
15. Monitoring your Amazon SES sending activity: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/monitor-sending-activity.html
16. Setting up Amazon SES event publishing: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/monitor-sending-using-event-publishing-setup.html
17. Pricing plans: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/pricing-plans.html
18. Service quotas in Amazon SES: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/quotas.html
19. Regions and Amazon SES: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/regions.html
20. Amazon SES reputation metrics and bounce/complaint handling: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/reputation-metrics.html
21. Request production access (Moving out of the Amazon SES sandbox: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/request-production-access.html
22. Using the Amazon SES API to send email: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/send-email-api.html
23. Amazon SES SMTP credentials: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/smtp-credentials.html
24. Amazon SES verified identities: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/verify-addresses-and-domains.html
25. What is Amazon SES? - Amazon Simple Email Service: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/Welcome.html
26. SendPigeon - Transactional Email API: https://sendpigeon.dev/
27. sendvia - the honest transactional email API on Amazon SES: https://sendvia.io/
28. Amazon SES introduces pricing plans: https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQErlV2znbgfS7co-Dz8t1CiLgyvn92J8Wd9Ir-iLLZd1VLzjU5Upk9FkUjU-S7AULo6MX_fvgYfBQDEuNXQ8HTvbkd0EcTIn8H9yOK7qfq-kbyjBuE6reeacx3DLqbLonWXTkXI0-17t49udFdeO8tVqp-tKHFxIkBa2OmR2F3gOd5Ygq5SJA==
29. Free Email API for Developers | Brevo: https://www.brevo.com/features/email-api/
30. Transactional Email Service with 99% Deliverability | Brevo: https://www.brevo.com/products/transactional-email/
31. Official pricing and terms source: https://aws.amazon.com/s/idc-server-side-test/awswt-989--ses-ux-aeo/ses-control/
32. Official pricing and terms source: https://aws.amazon.com/pricing/?nc2=h_pr_hub
33. Official pricing and terms source: https://aws.amazon.com/savingsplans/?nc2=h_pr_sp

Independent Sources

34. Amazon SES Pricing (2026: https://sendops.dev/amazon-ses-pricing/
35. Amazon SES Pricing Explained (2026: https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEeIcOL0G8O4mLq7qH1sNW8hhvzYqisrTJH7INw-MhVvqdwoO66xfXqha9ZKKYsFnx6gx58vYKQZCAOwJRsMLvYMGumgYQ1cCvVYEdTgrYThQcehGXdCJH82O8a68ZMJIxM=
36. Amazon SES Pricing Calculator: https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGfFKcpgVAkbhghuFfX1JPl23zON3IixyddO8rFlpL8ptqhwr1Z9LURO2XruPxCZ4RqdDWFeuOqvEl55UW-B45HNzaZhP_Ipe0fRauWFS070O4-0ISIuK_C2Z3RHnrawzI=
37. Amazon SES Pricing Official 2026: Core Sending Costs & Hidden Fees: https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGLctB2jGo90mQQvlwTeFkfAveSGQ3fU2_gwH-X1eUk95D-Uaaq4uITahc1t7J1jadmByMV0dS80_e0Iz-55M7lyPT1zm1DNmVTlCoVUYGokKQW4UDYaQ7CHf3Gbt6T57Fsn-FpFTn0mkamyZR21MOh65_P2avj5RIQJ-y5Cl8-G3vWLZY=
38. Amazon SES Rate Limits and Sending Quotas Explained: https://www.mailblast.io/blog/ses/amazon-ses-rate-limits-and-quotas